Wednesday, August 20, 2025
HomeLocalSwissThe Federal Council is opposed to the Tax on Emergencies - RTS.CH

The Federal Council is opposed to the Tax on Emergencies – RTS.CH

Therefore,

Federal council opposed tax emergencies:

Patients going to the emergency room for mild cases should not be taxed. However, The Federal Council rejected a parliamentary project on Wednesday in this direction. Furthermore, believing that this would not allow the emergency room to be unloaded.

The idea is part of a parliamentary initiative by former national vert’libéral councilor Thomas Weibel (PVL/ZH). Consequently, This involves relieving pressure emergencies by establishing a dissuasive financial incentive.

According to the project of the National Health Commission. Nevertheless, the cantons must have the competence to increase by 50 francs the maximum annual amount of the share payable by the person insured for each consultation in the emergency room, except for patients sent by a doctor, a “telemedecin” or a pharmacy. Pregnant women and children up to 18 are also excluded from this measure.

If the Federal Council says it understands the objective of unloading emergencies. it fears that federal council opposed tax emergencies the project does not allow this goal to be achieved. Rather, it would take an alternative solution.

However, emergencies are often the only access to medical care, especially outside office hours and during weekends. In rural regions, it is particularly difficult to find an available general practitioner, the government said in a statement. And to mention more targeted information and awareness to reduce the number of patients in the emergency room.

Additional costs – Federal council opposed tax emergencies

The government also invokes cost reasons. The new regulations would increase the administrative burden of cantons. insurers-maladie and providers of services, while complicating access to care for insured.

The cantons should monitor the implementation, carry out information campaigns and settle questions of responsibility, illustrates the Federal Council. As for insurers. they should determine after each consultation if the person lies in a canton having submitted the tax and check if they have a written request or if it is an emergency. federal council opposed tax emergencies Provision suppliers should make and control requests.

The Federal Council fears that these additional administrative charges generate “disproportionate additional costs compared to the probably questionable efficiency of. the measure”. However, it is that the administrative burden of medical services providers remains reasonable. Their staff, sometimes limited, must be able to devote themselves to the management and treatment of patients.

The government is not the only opposite to the project. During the consultation, the latter had aroused an outcry from associations and parties, for the same reasons.

ATS/looked

Further reading: Do not agree between Bern and Washington on customs dutiesZurich – French -speaking Switzerland, the big dropoutPublic holidays: France wants to remove two, and Switzerland?These stars also love our countryHealth: Our ancestors had the teeth straight than we.

nova.caldwell
nova.caldwell
Nova covers Pacific-Northwest volcano science, turning seismograph squiggles into edge-of-seat cliffhangers.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments