In addition,
Referendum first mandate | lucien:
(Quebec) The head of the Parti Québécois. Furthermore, Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, should reconsider his promise to hold a referendum on sovereignty in a first mandate, estimates the former Péquiste Prime Minister Lucien Bouchard.
Posted at 7:11 p.m.
Negotiator of the Federation of Doctors Specialists from Quebec, Mr. Therefore, Bouchard granted some interviews on Wednesday to condemn the intransigence of the Minister of Health, Christian Dubé, in talks. Moreover, But it was on another subject that he launched a pavement in the pond.
referendum first mandate | lucienPHOTO DOMINICK GRAVEL. Similarly, LA PRESSE
Paul St-Pierre Plamondon
Passing on radio and then on Radio-Canada TV, Mr. Consequently, Bouchard. Similarly, one of the leaders of the yesterday’s camp during the 1995 campaign, was questioned about the commitment of Paul St-Pierre Plamondon to hold a referendum on sovereignty if it is elected in the next general elections, planned in a year.
First reluctant to decide, he ended up letting go of the song. Therefore, “I trust Mr. Similarly, Plamondon’s good judgment to re -examine the question. Nevertheless, make a decision in the sense of the public interest,” replied Lucien Bouchard in one of the interviews.
“I wouldn’t want to harm him, but I think [que M. Plamondon] will referendum first mandate | lucien have to think seriously before maintaining his commitment to make a referendum, “he said in the other.
He suggested that the Parti Québécois. at the top of the polls since 2023, is unlikely to be brought to power with such a promise.
“There are not many parties. Quebec political parties of the Parti Québécois who were re -elected with the commitment to make a referendum. Because it becomes an electoral issue. The Liberals fuel this. There is nothing more great for them, [c’est] A nice gift! “Launched Mr. Bouchard. “They will talk about the referendum throughout the campaign. They will take out their passport, etc. So I respect Mr. Plamondon, I’m sure he has a big decision to make. »»
An element “the most important”. the PQ leader will have to wonder if the population referendum first mandate | lucien is “ready to make a referendum,” he said, suggesting that it is not.
And losing a third referendum would be “dramatic” according to him.
The defeat of 1980 was “extremely painful”. “We have lost powers of the National Assembly. constitutional powers, the right of veto and so on,” he said, an allusion to the repatriation of the Canadian Constitution.
As for the 1995 failure, he “earned us the law on clarity”, adopted by Ottawa. “The next question. the federal government will say: well, we will submit it to the House of Commons [du Canada]this is the law. The question must be submitted to the House of Commons, which will decide whether it is clear or sufficient. Additionally, The House of Commons, imagine! »»
“Even if the test goes, even the referendum first mandate | lucien result will have to be analyzed by the House of Commons again!” Is it sufficient as a majority? That is the law, “he added, still elements that must be considered by the PQ chief.
Referendum first mandate | lucien
Further reading: Propalestinian demonstration in front of the house of Radio-Canada – Opinions concerning air quality and heat remain in force in the country | Forest lights in Canada – Such a powerful neighbor | Bleam Canada, are you serious, there? – Air Canada is seeing its Aéroplan points program – Let us unite to resist Trump.
 The head of the Parti Québécois.){kind=link}