Civil trial: Gilbert Rozon says that the demands have “invented a truth”

For Gilbert Rozon. In addition. However. Similarly, it was the bait of gain and revenge that have motivated nine women to bring a civil prosecution for sexual assaults of which they attribute responsibility to him.

The founder of Just for Laughs. For example. In addition. Therefore, who submitted to a room fulfilled with his counter-examination on Wednesday at the Montreal courthouse, argued that the demands were “invented a truth”.

Gilbert Rozon is targeted by allegations of sexual assault by nine women in this civil trial. Meanwhile, Seven other women spoke as witnesses of similar facts, including Julie Snyder and Pénélope Mcquade.

The applicants in question demand $ 14 million from the ex-producer for the damage that the latter would have made them undergo.

Mr. Nevertheless. For example, Rozon presented his civil trial: gilbert rozon says new version of the facts, civil trial: gilbert rozon says new especially during an audience that has turned upside down last week. For example. However, civil trial: gilbert rozon says For example, The applicants today had the opportunity to question him about his allegations.

However. However. Additionally, However. when the lawyer for the demands, Me Bruce Johnston, asked the founder to laugh if he believed that each of them had lied in their respective testimonies, he replied that they had invented a truth Around a Huge financial issue and that they had ended up believing.

Mr. Additionally, However, Rozon thus argued that the real reason for this pursuit is money. In addition. a desire for revenge, more specifically related to a rejection or loss of job, in the case of certain applicants.

“These are all friends”

The civil trial: gilbert rozon says new ex-producer said that the demands had gone against him. Nevertheless, just like civil trial: gilbert rozon says new the speakers they called to the bar.

They are all friends.. . […] They have personal reasons to invent this truth or to lie, or [des raisons] professional. Some lie, others have invented a truth.

He also linked the intervention of host Julie Snyder to revenge. following the loss of an important contract on the occasion of the 375th anniversary of Montreal. of which he was commissioner.. a cabal that she led against him and Éric Salvail to carve out a place at the television station V.

1:51

Her former civil trial: gilbert rozon says new civil trial: gilbert rozon says spouse. Véronique Moreau. whose sister Sophie is among the complainants, came to testify to similar facts out of solidarity with his sister.

I don’t know if she shares [l’argent des dommages que pourrait éventuellement accorder le tribunal aux. plaignantes] with her sisterhe said.

In the case of actress Salomé Corbo. he affirms that her testimony of similar facts was invented to support his mother-in-lawthe complainant Danie Frenette.

Rozon says he is a victim of #Moiaussi

Gilbert Rozon also alleys to have become a. scapegoat for the #Moiaussi movement. the motivator sociological of the prosecution, according to him.

He civil trial: gilbert rozon says new repeated that he was fighting against what he described as Legalization of extortion by one coalition of the requests.

I defend the truthhammered civil trial: gilbert rozon says new Gilbert Rozon. Your civil trial: gilbert rozon says customers have changed from the start. all without exception, their versionhe added, specifying that his version was the Only not to have changed.

For the director general of Juripop. Sophie Gagnon. the testimony of Gilbert Rozon could bring a severe blow to the pursuit if the version of the facts. presented during her counter-examination was retained.

Me Sophie Gagnon said he saw in the attempt to bring together complainants. witnesses of similar facts in a coalition “another way of trying to undermine the credibility of the applicants” and “witnesses”.

In the version of Mr. Rozon’s facts. there was a strategy. a consultation in demand with various motivations such as revenge. envy, non-recognition and the desire to obtain money, so if this civil trial: gilbert rozon says new version is retained, it could undermine the credibility of the civil trial: gilbert rozon says demands.

However. she said. even if Gilbert Rozon was acquitted from a criminal accusation in a civil lawsuit, The burden of proof is different, it is indeed less demanding. It is the burden of proof of the balance of probabilities. it is a burden that continues to belong to the requests.

He is right to affirm that he was acquitted of this accusation. On the other hand. one can be acquitted from an accusation to civil trial: gilbert rozon says new the criminal but see his civil liability retained for similar factsshe nuances.

The counter-examination will continue next week, but the pleadings are planned in the fall.

With information from Amélie Desmarais. the Canadian press