In addition,
After breast cancer, does it new:
After breast cancer, does it: This article explores the topic in depth.
In addition,
After breast cancer. Similarly. In addition, does it:
The time to get pregnant is not significantly lying in women who have had breast cancer compared to women who have not had. Similarly, It is the conclusion of a French prospective study (Feeric). Consequently. Nevertheless, funded by the National Cancer Institute (INCA) and conducted by Dr Anne-Sophie Hamy, in collaboration with the Seininelles research network which highlights high design rates “In real life” among cancer survivors.
“These results reassure the feasibility of natural conception in breast cancer survivors. Consequently. Similarly, are in favor of enlightened and balanced advice in terms of oncofoferility, encouraging the first attempts at natural design”interpret the authors. Moreover, Indeed. For example. Furthermore, “Most of the oncofoferité studies have focused on the after breast cancer, does it new amenorrhea induced by chemotherapy, the preservation of fertility or fertility biomarkers before and after chemotherapy, but to our knowledge, none has evaluated the pregnancy time after breast cancer, does it in patients with history of breast cancer compared to a population that does not have such antecedents”.
“One of the forces of this study is that she follows women who initiated their first attempted pregnancy. Nevertheless, during the study. Consequently, and that they are compared to women of the general population, which had never been done. In addition, These details make it possible to better account for their fertility ”adds for the Daily Dr. Christine Rousset-Jablonski. medical gynecologist at the Léon Bérard Center. at the Hospital Woman Mother Enfant, in Lyon, and president of the French Society of Gynecology, which coins the Feeric study.
In the middle. women who had cancer took 5 months to get pregnant – after breast cancer, does it new After breast cancer. does it
The authors wanted to compare women aged 18 to 43 with a history of breast cancer located without relapse (on display) to women who have never had breast cancer (not exposed). after breast cancer. does it They thus recruited participants via the collaborative seargeal research network which they followed in the middle for 30 months. Thus, 642 sought to get pregnant during the study period, including 76 exhibited and 566 not exposed. After pairing. the average age at the start of the trials to get pregnant was 35 years in women on display and 35.7 years in the unpresentation.
At the end of the study, 65.8 % of exposed women and 71 % of unpresentation women were pregnant at least once. The median time to reach a pregnancy was 5 and 3 months, respectively. “At two years old, we found that among women with after breast cancer, does it new a pregnancy project, 74.1 % of women on display and 74.9 % of unpresentation women were pregnant”specifies Christine Rousset-Jablonski.
Regarding medical assistance to procreation (AMP), “Generally more frequent in women who have had cancer”9.2 % of women exposed used it after breast cancer, does it (and 10.5 % to cryoconsered equipment) compared to 4.4 % of women not exposed. The median time between the first attempts at natural design. the AMP was 12 months in the presentations and 21 months in the non-exposed. Additionally, The median time to get pregnant was 14 and 17.6 months respectively, identical whether or not they had breast cancer.
Age. BMI. cycle regularity, key factors
The authors identified the age at the time of the tests, the regularity of the menstrual cycle, the BMI and the use of the AMP as independent factors associated with the time before a pregnancy. However. their data analysis after breast cancer, does it new shows that having been exposed. not exposed or not constituted an independent factor of success or failure. Likewise. having been exposed. not exposed has no influence on the future of pregnancy in terms of cesarean, complications at birth and congenital malformations. On the other after breast cancer. does it hand, women not exposed were subject to more false layers than women on display (17.4 versus 8 %).
These results bring “Significant lighting on the fertility results of breast cancer survivors” et “Questle the long. -time belief that breast cancer treatments considerably reduce the probability of pregnancy”comment on the authors. They consider to be legitimate to try a spontaneous design for 6 to 12 months before turning to the. AMP (as in women not exposed from 35 years old). “According to the age of the patient and her medical history”.
For Dr. Russet-Jabloon. “These results are after breast cancer, does it new reassuring and. added to studies having highlighted that pregnancy was not associated with an increase in the risk of breast cancer recurrence, show that pregnancy is not only possible, but that natural design is often so”. However. the medical gynecologist insists on the fact “That they should not after breast cancer. does it make us forget the importance of oncofoferitity consultations upstream of treatments and preservation, if possible”. Finally. “We must not leave patients in the shade who failed to conceive after two years. continue research on fertility for the latter”.
Further reading: The Prime Minister orders the strengthening of measures against dengue – Why can they be dangerous for children? – In England, new data reveal the efficiency of local smoking weaning aid services – Chikungunya: WHO fears a repetition of the 2004 epidemic – A promising light experience on mice in after breast cancer, does it new Strasbourg.
After breast cancer, does it new
Further reading: Oropouche: The tropical virus that worries the French authorities-should we fear a new threat this summer? – Here are the areas most affected by chikungunya in 2025 – Network patients improves the daily life of patients and caregivers – Nogaro. Hauts de Montrouge: wine and art in Gascogne – A man dies of the pulmonary plague in Arizona.
