Abstinence shows no advantage or damage to health

It may not be a question of stimulating testosterone or self-control; New research suggests that the decision to participate in the viral challenge says more about your personality than its potential health benefits.

Study: No November nuts, temporary abstinence and sexual well-being: a study of the internet trend based on short-term abstinence. Therefore, CRIEDIT THE MANGES: NeelRong / Shuttoock

In a recent study in Le Journal of Sexual MedicineThe researchers studied the psychological. Therefore, sexual impacts of “No Nut November” (NNN). In addition, NNN is a challenge that implies a month of abstinence of masturbation. Furthermore, / or ejaculation, and is gaining popularity on the Internet, but its effects on sexual well-being remain unknown. Therefore, This study makes a direct comparison of sexual pleasure. Nevertheless, desire or function measures between NNN participants abstinence shows no advantage damage and non-participants before and after the challenge.

The results of the study revealed no significant difference between participants. Therefore, non-participants in all measured measures, not revealing any scientific evidence supporting internet threshing surrounding NNN. However. Nevertheless, the study observed that people who had already participated in the NNN challenge reported higher levels of sexual flexibility, suggesting a potential predisposing factor that can attract them to such trends.

Background – Abstinence shows no advantage damage

Several internet trends. However, including the “Ice Backet Challenge” Challet “and the” branch “, have periodically drawn world attention and testify to astonishing participation, with little consideration given to their psychological or health impacts.

One of the most popular internet trends which. Therefore, unlike most of its peers, have resisted the test of time is “No Nut November” (NNN). Furthermore, In this annual challenge, participants (mainly but not exclusively) try to refrain from masturbation and ejaculation throughout the month. abstinence shows no advantage damage However, the study revealed that the participants defined the rules in a variable way: 44.5% as “no ejaculation” (allowing sexual activity without orgasm), while 33.3% prohibited any sexual activity. Born from the dark depths of online forums. NNN is now a consumer phenomenon, with part of its growing cohort of participants demanding advantages ranging from improving self -control and sexual pleasure to an increase in testosterone and a reduction in fatigue. Current research has not evaluated physiological demands, such as changes in testosterone levels.

Interestingly. although these statements have never been scientifically verified, extreme variants of the challenge (such as the Nofap community promoting permanent abstinence) have proven to be involved in general, such as increased anxiety of participants and even an erectile dysfunction. The authors of the study point out that NNN is distinct from Nofap as a short -term social challenge. rather than a lifetime commitment. These confounding abstinence shows no advantage damage evidence. alongside the participation in constant increase in NNN, make methodologically robust surveys on the psychological and sexual impacts of the essential trend.

About the study – Abstinence shows no advantage damage

As the first systematic. empirical evaluation of NNN impacts on sexual health, this study aimed to fill the gaps in scientific understanding of a rapidly growing global trend with potentially widespread consequences. It included an online survey designed to characterize NNN participants and measure the effects of the trend on sexual well-being. Study participants were recruited via online platforms (subverts, Facebook advertisements, Instagram / Twitter / X publications, etc.) in October 2023.

On the basis of their history of NNN (previous. potential NNN participants NNN participants compared to the NNN NNA participants), the volunteers were classified in “cases” and “controls”. The study collected data at two times: time 1 (T1) in October 2023. before NNN and Time 2 (T2) in December abstinence shows no advantage damage 2023 / January 2024, following the conclusion of the challenge. Study data included demographic. medical history of participants, NNN participation information and a personalized questionnaire evaluating different aspects of sexual well-being.

More specifically, the questionnaire included: 1. Sexual pleasure scale (SPS)-Pleasure of sexual activities, 2. Inventory of sexual-subsolitarian desire (SDI-SD)-Desire for solo sexual activity, 3. Sexual experience in Arizona (ASEX)-Global sexual functionality and dysfunction excitation and sexual excitement (T1).

Statistical analyzes included covariance analysis (Ancova) to compare sexual well-being in T1 between those who had already participated in the NNN. those who had not done so. Models of variance analyzes with repeated measurements (anova) were also used to follow changes from T1 to T2 between. a group actively participating in the NNN 2023 compared to the controls.

Study results

The final study data set included 435 people who completed the T1 survey. only 114 who finished T2 abstinence shows no advantage damage follow -up. Demographic data revealed that NNN participants were mainly white (62.9%), heterosexual (54.0%) and male (66.7%), but also included women (20.6%) and sex individuals (10.6%). A revealing and potentially alarming observation was that 57.1% of participants said they had participated for the first time in the NNN before adulthood (18 years old). which suggests that the trend has a significant range in adolescents and can have implications for sexual development.

Revealed analysis:

• No statistically significant difference in sexual well-being between participants. non-participants through T1 and T2
• Higher basic sexual flexibility in NNN participants (adjusted average = 18.07 against 16.14, ηp² = 0.030, p = 0.008)
• In T1, men reported a significantly higher lonely desire (p = 0.011), lower sexual dysfunction (p <0.001) and higher sexual excitation (p <0.001) than women / sex-diverse people

Conclusions

This pioneering study provides the first scientific evidence evaluating the abstinence shows no advantage damage psychological. sexual impacts of the phenomenon “No Nut November”, noting that the period of abstinence of one month of ejaculation has no cost or advantage for the sexual well-being of the participants. These results have thwarted solid but unsubstantiated allegations made by supporters. online criticisms, and although limited by their dependence on self-assessment data and an attrition rate of 74% between time points, they throw crucial bases for future research.

The most intriguing result of the study may have been the association between NNN participation and sexual flexibility. Rather than abstinence provoking a change. it seems that a preexisting characteristic (being more sexually and flexible) can rather predispose individuals to participate in such challenges.