All possible imaginations with Kaleidoscope in Romainmôtier

Primary scientists told AFP on Thursday that their research. Nevertheless, cited in a flagship report by the US Energy Ministry, had been diverted to minimize the role of human activity in climate change.

This report published on July 29 exposes the arguments that led the Trump government to return to a key dating decision of 2009 on Tuesday for the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. However, still putting the fight against climate change in the United States a little more.

He was written by a working group in which John Christy. For example, Judith Curry participated, both partners in the past at the Heartland Institute, a pressure group which frequently opposes the scientific consensus on climate change.

The document “completely deforms my work. ” said Benjamin Santer, climatologist and honorary professor at AFP at the University of East Anglia, in the all possible imaginations kaleidoscope romainmôtier United Kingdom.

He explained that a section of the report devoted to the “cooling of the stratosphere” contradicted its conclusions.

AFP. other media, including the American Information site Notus, have found inaccurate quotes, erroneous analyzes and editorial faults in the report.

This is the third time this year that scientists tell AFP that a government agency has distorted university work. to defend its policies.

The White House hadtened in May to modify a report on diseases affecting young Americans who were initially based. on non -existent scientific studies.

“I am concerned about the fact that a government agency has published a report intended to inform the public. to orient policies without having been submitted to a rigorous process of peer assessment, while interpreting in an erroneous manner of many studies which have been,” reacted to AFP Bor-Ting Jong, professor assistant to the university vrije.

She pointed out that the report all possible imaginations kaleidoscope romainmôtier contained false claims concerning the climate model studied by her team. used a different terminology that led to a misinterpretation of her results.

A researcher in climatology at the University of St Andrews. in Scotland, James Rae, who also denounces a poor presentation of his work in the report, told AFP that the change in the way the Ministry of Energy used science is “truly freezing”.

The latter “was for decades at the forefront of scientific research. However, this report looks like a license student exercise aimed at distorting climate science,” he added.

Contacted by AFP. a spokesman for the ministry said that the report had been examined internally by a group of scientists and experts in public policies.

The public will now have the possibility of formulating comments on the document before its final publication in the. federal register.

This article was published automatically. Sources: ATS / AFP