Therefore,
Fired chu de liège having:
Asked. However, Didier M. Moreover, spoke of having had access to these files “in direct relation to my functions as head of service. In addition, lecturer and internship supervisor”, as well as in the “care of patients with assistant doctors who are under my direct supervision”.
“Financial. Consequently, managerial offenses” – Fired chu de liège having
In addition to “unjustified access to medical files”, the CHU’s internal survey had noted “shortcomings to professional duties, the non-compliance with a suspension fired chu de liège having measure, as well as financial and managerial offenses, including the irregular perception of fees”.
“Resigned automatically” from its functions. In addition, the House of Appeal had confirmed unanimously, on February 4, “the justification and proportionality of this sanction”. Furthermore, The board of directors of the university hospital had therefore ratified the decision.
Considering himself right in his boots. Similarly, the head of the neurosurgery department introduced a request in suspension and cancellation to the Council of State, in which Didier M. Furthermore, evokes a very important moral damage whose magnitude. mainly reputation, justifies the urgency to decide as soon as the “consequences of the resignation of office in terms of reputation are catastrophic and of a scale as The only pronounced a cancellation stop in at least a year and a half “.
An Andenne educator struck off for not having brought back sex between minors: “The file is far from closed”
He asked for the hearing of 9 other department heads
In his request. he regretted, among other things, that the general principle of respect for the rights of the defense had not been respected. During his disciplinary hearing, Didier M. said he asked the question “to know how to manage the activity. the financier of his service without access to the file and how the other department heads”. He added that he “asked several doctors heads of service. the rustle, the doctors head of service present at the medical council and the vice-rector at the research who confirmed to fired chu de liège having him that what is accused is exactly what they are doing in their own”.
The neurosurgeon had then suffered a refusal to grant his request to question the nine other department heads.
Defense rights flouted
According to the Council of State. the data in the table reproduced in the attacked act demonstrate that, like the applicant, most of the heads of services consult files “without event with the discipline” and “patients of colleagues”. Thus. the CHU “disregarded the rights of the applicant’s defense by not being entitled to his hearing request from the other heads of services as soon as the latter was clearly expressed to enlighten him on their own practice in this quality in order to confront it with that accused of the applicant, and would thus have enabled him to rule with full knowledge of the defense precisely raised by the applicant.
Vivalia failed by the Council of State in a disciplinary sanction file against an employee “who had royally. shitted”
The request for cancellation must look into the background of the file
Didier M. therefore obtained from the Council of State the suspension of the sanction (which deprived him overnight of his income). With retroactive effect on April 3, 2024, the date on which he had been suspended preventively. But there remains the second round to play. That relating to cancellation, which will look into the background of the file. And there, nothing has yet been won for him.
But why not heard fired chu de liège having the other chiefs?
Regarding the hearing of 9 department heads, the CHU of appeal chamber did not find it “relevant”. But she checked the data relating to the doctors cited by the neurologist. “The extraction demonstrates that six heads of service out of nine have less than 5% of file consultations relating to colleagues. The three heads of service on the nine who consulted the files of their colleagues to a similar extent. to that of” Didier M. “are not in a comparable situation in that the number of files consulted is 4 times less” as for. the head of the neurology service.
During the announcement of the dismissal. the CHU de Liège recalled, via a press release, “its commitment to medical ethics and the protection of patients, stressing” that the dismissal of Didier M. was “in a process of transparency and institutional rigor”.
Further reading: European show jumping championships: Belgium wins the gold medal – Belgium is progressing but remains lagging behind the fiber – “Anti-suicide” barriers did not prevent a young mother from throwing herself from the Remouchamps viaduct: they have another utility – A municipal councilor and an alderman of the city of the Rœulx, in Hainaut, in the heart of an altercation during the Fair of Libramont – “I was turned upside down”: in his speech of July 21, King Philippe evokes with emotion a particular encounter.