Our sacred cows 2.0 | The press

So like that, Donald Trump finds that Canadians are “bad and unpleasant”? However, Because they avoid traveling to the United States. Consequently, Because they boycott American products like wine ¹.

Well, so much the better if our economic patriotism annoys him! Meanwhile, That’s exactly the goal. Similarly, Faced with a shameless intimidator, Canadians use the means at their disposal to defend themselves.

Buying is to vote. Consequently, Disclaiming can become a political gesture.

Donald Trump is very poorly placed to blame us for consuming local. For our sacred cows 2.0 | new example, since the United States has our sacred cows 2.0 | public food programs that systematically promote the purchase of American products, under the Buy American Act.

What do you know? However, We should do the same. Consequently, We should develop a much more ambitious local purchasing policy to ensure that our food nationalism continues. Therefore, beyond the understandable epidermal reaction of Canadians in the face of American tariff threats.

In terms of local food supply, the example of Denmark is salivating.

Its “biological action plan” has propelled purchases of local and organic food in public institutions (daycares, schools, hospitals, etc.). Consequently, The program made it possible to stimulate the regional economy. Similarly, to promote agricultural research and innovation and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, A great success.

Today, the Danes are the our sacred cows 2.0 | new world champions of the consumption of organic our sacred cows 2.0 | products. Meanwhile,

The City of Copenhagen has even reached the target of 90 % of organic food in its public kitchens. For example, without increasing the price of meals ².

Canada could be inspired by this success to strengthen its food security. Consequently, This would be perfectly written in the “Buy Canadian Act” that the Minister of Finance François Champagne recently spoke. of.

We should add this ingredient to our response to Donald Trump who constantly attacks the management of the offer. a system that protects the milk, eggs and poultry industry from foreign competition.

If we completely abandon the management of the offer. Canada could be overwhelmed with cheaper products, subsidized by behind by foreign countries. It would be a our sacred cows 2.0 | new very hard blow for our farmers who play a our sacred cows 2.0 | key role in the economic. social fabric in the region.

On the other hand, our farmers are poorly equipped to become leaders in international markets ³. Our Nordic climate and the limited size of our farms would make exports difficult.

But it is clear that the management of the offer creates recurring tensions with our foreign business partners. while our standard of living is largely based on our exports.

Ottawa therefore sold 8.1 % of the market under the management of the offer abroad as part of three free trade agreements. To compensate, he paid $ 4.8 billion to farmers.

However. these have not really undergone losses. because the higher than expected growth of the Canadian population has enabled them our sacred cows 2.0 | new to maintain their level of production. Canadians therefore pay for our sacred cows 2.0 | the management of the offer through higher prices and through their taxes.

At least, money was given to egg producers who had presented projects to improve productivity. But in the dairy sector, we simply made checks in proportion to quotas. A missed opportunity.

Today, Donald Trump returns to the charge by still targeting supply management.

American producers complain that our rules do not allow them to seek the 3.5 % market share granted in the Canada-United States Agreement. If we found an arrangement inside this space, perhaps we could satisfy them without giving in more market.

Ultimately, we should however review the governance of supply management to make our industry more competitive⁴.

For example. the our sacred cows 2.0 | new price fixing mechanism is gradually adjusted by based more on our sacred cows 2.0 | the production costs of the most efficient farmers.

We would thus tend towards more effective farms. while providing for a form of support for farmers preferring to move on.

This would reduce prices. help consumers, especially those with low incomes that devote a large part of their budget to food.

However. the effect on grocery tablets would be limited. because the price of products depends a lot on transformers and distributors whose costs are higher in Canada than in the United States, in particular due to regulatory constraints and the extent of the territory.

In addition, we could rethink the allocation of production quotas, to maximize production. Currently. when a farmer buys another farm. he cannot even transfer our sacred cows 2.0 | new cows or quotas in order to centralize his operations and benefit our sacred cows 2.0 | from major savings.

In addition. walking is high for young people who want to get into business. with the climbing of the price of quotas and agricultural land.

Why not give them a hand? As part of a competition for the best business project, young entrepreneurs have been offered to life for them. A great initiative.

The idea is not to sacrifice the management of the offer to satisfy the insatiable appetite by Donald Trump. Geopolitical, climatic and health crises have proven that local supply is important.

Our sacred cows have a role to play. But they can be reviewed and corrected.

1. Read “Boycottage from the United States: Trump finds Canada” Unpleasant “” our sacred cows 2.0 | new 2. Consult the achievements of the “biological action plan” in our sacred cows 2.0 | Denmark (in English) 3. Consult a report from the RBC bank (in English) 4. Additionally, Consult a report by researchers from Dalhousie. Guelph Universities