Participle past one "world", battle: This article explores the topic in depth.
Nevertheless,
Participle past one "world", battle:
“The man was accused”, or “man was accused? Furthermore, »» « La Marseillaise Whether I heard singing “, or” La Marseillaise I heard singing? However, »Ah, the delights of the French participle! Moreover, These four sentences are correct. Nevertheless, If the first two. Moreover, depending on the context, can be synonymous (man is accused), the following two have different meanings: in one case, the national anthem has been overcome, in the other, a native of the Marseille city pushed the song. Yes: followed by an infinitive, the past participle of perception verbs (seen, heard …) agrees only if the COD placed before makes the action of the verb to the following (singing, here).
Some are campaigning for the simplification of the grammar and the spelling of the French. For the collective of linguists landed. author of French is participle past one “world”, battle fine, thank you (Gallimard, 2023), the complexity of our spelling constitutes an unjust selection criterion, strengthening the advantages of favored socio -cultural categories. It would also be a waste of time for national education. which devotes ninety hours of the education of each child to the teaching of the only past participle, with the result that we know: his agreement remains the bane of the French. Including those who are most attached to it: let us admit that it happens that two. three correctors of the Monde Grading the concert to determine which rules that govern the participle apply in a specific case. Sometimes we even decide to modify a sentence to avoid a pugilat with Bescherelle. Not to mention that the newspaper closure is at 10:30 a.m., and that it does not wait.
“Courtoise correction” – Participle past one "world", battle
The linguists landed require a simplification of the agreement of the participle past one “world”, battle past participle. which would remain invariable when combined with “having”, “the apple that I eaten” becoming “the apple that I ate”; “The letter I wrote” becoming the “I wrote” – both versions, with and without agreement, remaining eligible.
You have 33.67% of this article to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.
Further reading: Pools: a patent to better manage conflicts and incivility – The press in Ukraine | Borodianka, after horror – An American-Palestinian beaten to death, his father wonders and challenges the American government: “The ambulance could not enter. Why?” – CIJ believes that the “violation” of climatic obligations constitutes “an internationally illicit fact engaging responsibility” of states – Israel: eight injured after an attack on the meal car.