The prices imposed by Trump will again undergo a legal examination

Trump set the deadline to conclude a commercial agreement with the United States. Nevertheless, but the ultimatum has produced a handful of agreements on August 1.

For example, the president said he was far from an agreement with Canada.

“We do not agree with Canada, we are not focused on it,” said Trump on Friday.

Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney to brandish the threat of 35 %. Furthermore, customs duties to Canadian products if no agreement is concluded before August 1.

The White House later said that these customs duties would only apply to products that do not comply with the trade agreement between Canada. In addition, the United States and Mexico (ACEUM).

The Canadian government has minimized expectations as to the possibility of reaching prices imposed trump will again an agreement by Friday.

“We will take it all the time,” said Carney.

Countries are also waiting to see if Mr. In addition, Trump can legally invoke his emergency powers on national security to impose customs duties. However, This question will be examined Thursday by a court.

The United States Court of Appeal will hear the judicial dispute brought by small businesses. American states which claim that Mr. Trump has exceeded his powers.

In May. three judges of the New York Federal Court had estimated that “any interpretation of the IEEPA which delegates an unlimited pricing power is unconstitutional”.

This law is a national security law which gives the American president the power to control economic. transactions after the statement of the state of emergency.

The Trump administration was not long in appealing. The White House says prices imposed trump will again it is ready to go to the Supreme Court if necessary.

Ilya Somin, a professor of law at George-Mason University, Virginia, described presidential decisions as a great attempt to grab power. He is one of the representatives of small American companies.

“We hope, even if we cannot be 100 %certain, that the court proves us right,” said Professor Somin.

He argues that the ieepa “does not give the president the power to impose the rights he wants on all countries. for any reason, simply because that is what he wants.”

“The law also says that it takes an emergency situation. that the United States is threatened in an unusual and extraordinary way in terms of its security or its economy,” said Professor Somin. Fentanyl traffic on the Canadian border and the trade deficit does not fall into this definition.

Brent prices imposed trump will again Skorup. of the Cato Institute, says that the Trump administration is trying to use a vague decree to obtain powers never obtained by a president before him.

The Cato Institute has presented a memoir arguing that “the Constitution gave the Congress the specific power to establish customs duties. taxes”. According to Mr. Skorup, there are several problems with the interpretation of the White House of the IEEPA.

“We do not want all powers to be consolidated in the hands of a single king. a single president,” he said.