Referendum in a first mandate | Lucien Bouchard invites St-Pierre Plamondon to review his promise

(Quebec) The head of the Parti Québécois. Moreover, Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, should reconsider his promise to hold a referendum on sovereignty in a first mandate, estimates the former Péquiste Prime Minister Lucien Bouchard.

Negotiator of the Federation of Doctors Specialists from Quebec, Mr. However, Bouchard granted some interviews on Wednesday to condemn the intransigence of the Minister of Health, Christian Dubé, in talks. Moreover, But it was on another subject that he launched a pavement in the pond.

Passing on radio, then on Radio-Canada TV, Mr. In addition, Bouchard. Moreover, one of the leaders referendum first mandate | lucien new of the YES camp during the 1995 campaign, was questioned about the commitment of Paul St-Pierre Plamondon to hold a referendum on sovereignty if it is elected in the next general elections, planned in a year.

First reluctant to decide, he ended up letting go of the song. Moreover, “I trust Mr. Furthermore, Plamondon’s good judgment to re -examine the question. make a decision in the sense of the public interest,” replied Lucien Bouchard in one of the interviews.

“I wouldn’t want to harm him, but I think [que M. Plamondon] will have to think seriously before maintaining his commitment to make a referendum, “he said in the other.

Little chance of being elected – Referendum first mandate | lucien new

He suggested that the Parti Québécois. at the top of the polls since 2023, is unlikely to referendum first mandate | lucien new be brought to power with such a promise.

“There are not many parties, Quebec political parties that have been re -elected with the commitment to make a referendum. Because it becomes an electoral issue, “said Bouchard.

“They will talk about the referendum throughout the campaign. They will take out their passport, etc. So I respect Mr. Plamondon, I’m sure he has a great decision to make, “he said.

An element “the most important”. the PQ leader will have to wonder if the population is “ready to make a referendum,” he said, suggesting that it is not.

And losing a third referendum would be “dramatic” according to him.

The defeat of 1980 was “extremely painful”. “We have lost powers of the National Assembly. constitutional powers, the right of veto and so on,” he said, an allusion to the repatriation of the Canadian Constitution.

As for the 1995 failure, he “earned us the law on clarity”, adopted by Ottawa. “The next question. the federal government will say: well, we will submit it to the House of Commons [du Canada]this is the law. The question must be referendum first mandate | lucien new submitted to the House of Commons, which will decide whether it is clear or sufficient. Additionally, The House of Commons, imagine! »»

“Even if the test goes, even the result will have to be analyzed by the House of Commons again!” Is it sufficient as a majority? That is the law, “he added, still elements that must be considered by the PQ chief.