“Tax selfishness does not make a political project”

Jhe is part of the generation of “Nicolas”. Furthermore, The one who is not cynical, not disengaged … In addition, but simply lucid to the point of being disgusted. Similarly, The one who pays without illusions. Meanwhile, contributes without promise, the one to whom we repeat that she should feel lucky to finance a model that we empty each year a little more of her substance.

I note around me the concrete consequences of the tax strangulation of young workers. In addition, I see their growing desire to send everything waltz. Consequently, I understand this desire. But I also know what it is not to want to betray your principles. even when the desire to say “I get back from the game” becomes tempting.

What we have seen for a few weeks in the media. “tax selfishness does not make on the networks – this staging of a generation of thirty -something people who say they are proud to no longer want to pay, proud to trick with the system and to assume their own “Tax revenge” – is not a political awakening, but a dramatic confusion between revolt and flight.

It is not a lucid reappropriation of its contribution to the collective. It is a symptom of more than one time that no longer knows how to differentiate justice. comfort, solidarity and optimization calculation. It is yacht passenger syndrome: faced with the inclination of the boat. he believes that the whole sea has gone against him, and it concludes that it is urgent to no longer finance the maintenance of the ship … while continuing to take advantage of the crossing.

Open to brutality – "tax selfishness does not make

This speech, which claims to make selfishness a form of “tax selfishness does not make lucidity, is anything but spontaneous. He is methodically instrumentalized. Behind the apparent generational freshness. slogans under algorithmic steroids, there is an old political grammar: that which assimilates tax with a punishment, solidarity with absurdity, the State has an necessarily hostile bureaucracy which should be released.

These are not new ideas. These are old strings – recycled in a cool. algorithmic aesthetic – of the liberal right, which claims to defend the “New average classes” While it only opens the way to systemic dissociating a little more. That is to say to brutality.

You have 56.29% of this article to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.