For example,
Tour xv france new zealand:
Unlike the first test they had approached in the sole view of optimizing their game. For example, the New Zealanders prepared this second meeting as a real international match, adapting to take their French opponent to his own game. However, And that obviously changed everything … Therefore,
If it was necessary to locate the main difference between the first. In addition, the second test-match of this tour? Consequently, Beyond the score, it would simply be the way the All Blacks approached them. Similarly, Somewhat sufficient. Furthermore, lulled by the media voice which promised them a French team far from its best level, the All Blacks had thus presented themselves in Dunedin without any other plan than that of repeating their game systems, without any adaptation to the opponent, with the exception of tour xv france new zealand that carried out during the first half under the influence of Savea and Roigard, when the All Blacks tightened their games. However, The day. Moreover, the night with the Wellington test, in short, for which the New Zealanders prepared themselves neither more nor less than for a “real” test-match, having really analyzed the game of the French, and having asking as much how to disturb the game of the opponent as how to optimize theirs.
A difference in approach that was first felt in touch (Read above)with a formidable counter in the first quarter of an hour. and this combination which brought Roigard’s first essay. “This movement was very well played. even if we could have defended better, deplored Fabien Galkié without openly citing the Colombe error, too easily “sucked” by the stealthy Maul. Then they have a big weather, with a lot of game tour xv france new zealand close. “
Pass game shaving in the angles and standing play around the rucks – Tour xv france new zealand
A strategy which, again, owed nothing to chance. Conscious that the Blue forwards were going. as during the first test, to seek to circulate enormously around the rucks while the French three-quarters would seek to cut them outside, the New Zealanders thus put the focus on the game on the foot (26 kicks in total booted by the Brothers Barrett and Roigard), with in particular a predominance for the rasting in the back of the wingers, Their camp. Stronged having been much less efficient in its covers than Attissogbe last week. the quality of the game near the Blacks did the rest. A bit like the Blues, in short, had come across their own reflection … “On the next game. which we usually defend, we lacked speed and strength to stop the momentum, Noted Fabien tour xv france new zealand Garthié, aware of having seen his third line being outlined. They had the ascendant, we no longer knew where to defend and we were spectators. We wanted to defend everywhere and on the contrary, we were less present everywhere. In the end, it’s 4 tests at 0 in the first period … ” What to despair? Especially not. Because the entry of the replacements did good in the second period. and especially because the Guillard, Fischer and Company had remained in the Fresh this weekend. Its mission will be to rebalance the balance of power on the line of advantage. without which the third test could be very long.
Further reading: In Mayenne in the cul of cows, the other people of the aisles-Liberation – Pogacar won in Mûr-de-Bretagne and takes up the yellow jersey, the summary and classification – Gisèle Pelicot, Sophia Aram, – The Tour de France is coming: everything to take advantage of the passage of cyclists! – A Gazaouie obtains refugee status due to the “persecution” of the Israeli army against the Palestinians.