Trial in Vevey: 4 years in prison for rape against the improval teacher

Many tears welcomed Thursday evening the verdict of the East Vaud Criminal Court: 4 years in prison. Moreover, the life ban to exercise any activity with children were pronounced against the Impro and theater teacher accused of sexual abuse Out of eleven students, between 2009 and 2019. Consequently, Saux gains from the ranks of the complainants and the many audiences who came to support them all week.

The sentence pronounced by the East Vaud Criminal Court is much more severe than the 30 months in prison. In addition, including 6 closes Required Tuesday by the prosecutor Laurie Roccaro. Nevertheless, For two reasons: unlike the public prosecutor. Consequently, the Court chaired by Anne-Catherine Page retained sexual constraint in the majority of cases. Meanwhile, And above all, rape was selected, in a situation. Similarly, Sexual acts with children and on people unable to resistance are added to the list of offenses.

Psychological violence as a means of constraint – Trial vevey: 4 years prison

The judges considered that the ascendant exercised by the accused through his status as an adult. a teacher, the figure in the theatrical environment, of a man experienced on the sexual level, had produced a pressure assimilable to a constraint on his targets, much younger than him: “For trial vevey: 4 years prison many years [le prévenu] drew from the pool of young people he attracted around him to satisfy his sexual impulses. He chose the most fragile. ”

The judges also note how much the changing faces of the teacher helped put pressure. He aroused admiration. was considered both as a “confidant”, a “mentor” or a “big brother” while reigning a certain terror: blackmail – especially suicide -, threats, anger and mood swings were feared and helped to hinder the resistance capacity of adolescents and young adults that he attracted in alcoholic evenings and sexual connotation games.

A real “method”

The rape retained by the Court particularly. illustrates what the lawyers of the complainants had described as the “method” of the actor. The president summarizes: “[La plaignante] had found an attentive ear in him. they had exchanged trial vevey: 4 years prison sexual messages when she was a schoolgirl. The defendant had insisted that this relationship remains secret. He knew his influence on young people and the benefits he could draw from it. In an atmosphere imbued with sexuality deliberately put in place, his actions were presented as essential to theatrical evolution. By maintaining a complete sexual intercourse. when she had opposed, putting his hand on his mouth, he used the psychic and physical constraint. It’s a rape. “

At this point in reading. the community of friends of the theatrical environment, seated in the rows of the public throughout the trial, let out its tears, echoing those, inexhaustible, of the young woman concerned. The defendant, nodding his head from left to right, has retained an impassive face.

The Court also underlined the “clear, constant and devoid of animosity” statements trial vevey: 4 years prison of the complainants and underlined “a zero awareness”.

The defendant will appeal

Sangs. hugs, distribution of roses, the public left the court in an almost collected silence, letting the accused mingle with the procession towards the exit, without a word or an invective. “I am relieved and happy that justice takes into account structural violence,” says a young woman leaving the building. In this back -to -school week, it is a message that is important to convey children. ”

“It was important for the victims that their suffering was recognized after all these years. ” notes Me Coralie Devaud, who defended several complainants. It is not so much the punishment that my clients expected from this procedure. but the assurance that it never happens again. The prohibition to exercise any activity with minors is what trial vevey: 4 years prison was most likely. ”

Defender. Me Mirko Giorgini, who hoped for a compatible sentence with a complete stay, reacts: “It is an excessive sanction, which does not take into account the evolution of my client, and against which we will form appeal. Obviously. social development has played a role, but I continue to maintain that the objective conditions of rape are not retained and that the constraint cannot be retained in several cases. ”

Did you find an error? Please report it to us.

2 comments