The Trump administration maintains the vagueness on the use of federal funds, the congress is worried

Nevertheless,

Trump administration maintains vagueness use:

About 300 students from Cleveland Heights. Consequently, Ohio, could see their tutoring activities after school and their English courses upset, unless the administration of President Donald Trump unlocks the federal subsidy of $ 860,000 intended for the start of the school year.

This funding is one of the more than $ 6 billion in school funds frozen on July 1 for national educational programs. Furthermore, leaving school officials, including Elizabeth Kirby of Cleveland Heights, in budgetary uncertainty. However, “We have not received any information on the possibility of receiving this money or not,” she deplores.

This lack of clarity is part of a broader trend: the Trump administration provides less. Therefore, less details on how it plans to spend public money, arousing criticism, including in the republican ranks of the Congress.

“Delayed budgets. Meanwhile, missing details and the absence of spending plans trump administration maintains vagueness use make the federal budget less transparent and less responsible before the people and its elected representatives,” said Maine republican senator, Susan Collins, president of the Senate credits committee, in Russell Vought, director of the management and budget office (OMB), during a hearing on June 25.

The OMB and the White House did not respond to the requests to comment. Meanwhile, In previous declarations. For example, the OMB indicated that blocked educational funds were the subject of a “programmatic examination” due to the first observations that certain subsidy programs were “roughly diverted to support a left left agenda”.

For budgetary experts. Similarly, this refusal to share a wide range of details on expenses borders on illegality, complicates the upcoming budget process and breaks with the tradition of increased transparency of public spending.

“At this stage of the year. However, never the information available, both for the public and for the congress, trump administration maintains vagueness use has not been so unreliable on the actual expenses of agencies since the establishment of the modern budget in 1974,” said David Taylor, former manager of the Budget House Builder under George HW Bush and former budget advisor to the head of the majority in the Senate, Bob Dole, Iq.

The American Constitution gives the congress the power to decide on the allocation of public money. which the executive must then distribute through its agencies.

But since the adoption in March of an annual provisional budget – signed by Trump – parliamentarians have questions. about the destination of funds. Many federal agencies have not shared the expenditure plans required by law. or have transmitted incomplete data, according to American elected officials.

“This administration has – more than any other during my mandate – refused to transmit basic information to this commission. ” accuses Democratic Senator Patty Murray, 32 years of trump administration maintains vagueness use experience in the Senate and her party’s leader on budgetary issues.

This showdown on federal budgetary powers will be put to the test again this week. while the Senate examines the request of the administration to cancel $ 9 billion in foreign aid and public media grants, which could call into question the funding adopted in March by Republican majority.

In early June. the Congress, controlled by the Republicans, narrowly adopted the vast law of tax reduction and expenditure of Trump, overlying the objections of certain Republicans regarding the impact on the national debt, which amounts to 36.2 dollars.

“We need more information”

The administration’s refusal to provide detailed expenditure plans has placed ministers in difficulty in the Capitol in recent weeks. the law requiring that this information is submitted before the end of April.

“We need more information than that received. ” said Republican President of the Credit Commission of trump administration maintains vagueness use the House of Representatives, Tom Cole (Oklahoma), to the defense secretary Pete Hegseth in June, more than a month after the deadline for the transmission of the expense plan.

“I do my best. ” replied the director of the FBI, Kash Patel, during his hearing in May, referring responsibility to other administration services in the face of insistence on the lack of details.

“We have a lot of files in progress … while we are trying to strengthen our teams. ” said the interior secretary, Doug Burgum, under pressure from Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley (Oregon), about the lack of clarity on conservation projects.

Even the plans transmitted included significant gaps: the plan of the department of health. social services included 530 asterisks in place of the precise amounts allocated to certain programs, according to Patty Murray and the Democratic representative Rosa Delauro, leader of the Credit Commission in the Chamber.

trump administration maintains vagueness use “The fact that parliamentarians publicly debate these questions means that multiple attempts to get this behind -the -scenes information failed. ” analyzes Joe Carlile, former Democratic budgetary.

A fracture on transparency

Donald Trump’s desire to reduce the size of the federal state would also explain the little case granted by his administration to Congress Questions. believes Cerin LindgrensAvage, lawyer at Protect Democracy, an organization that pursues the administration for deleting information on online spending.

“Usually. the members of the executive avoid putting the credit commission on the back, because it is risky to bite your hand that feeds you. But today. the congress is negotiating in the face of an executive which seems delighted to cut more in expenses, ”analyzes Lindgrensavage.

The secretary of veterans. Doug Collins, relied on the directives of the Budget Office of the White House and a decision of the 1983 Supreme Court on the emergency powers trump administration maintains vagueness use to justify the way in which his department informed the “reprogramming” Congress of funds deemed superfluous by the administration.

Parliamentary officials responsible for supervising the veterans’ budget demanded that the department are requesting their approval before redirecting the funds.

“The way in which this secretary. and this administration, interacted with Congress to move hundreds of millions of dollars from one account to another is unprecedented,” denounced Democratic representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Florida).

The commission republican leader. John Carter (Texas), has abounded in his direction: “I have been sitting on this commission for 20 years … and there is no question that this is changing today. »»

Trump administration maintains vagueness use

Further reading: Trade war | Foreign investments still there in Montreal despite instabilitySurvey: the federalness spends too much to the taste of Quebecers3.5 and 3 million euros fine for Mint and BCM Energy“It’s like piloting an airplane underwater”: the Seanxt Elite scooter pushes standards with its crazy speed and underwater GPSThe hoteliers get a new victory against Booking.

Comments (0)
Add Comment