Will we have to think: who of man or AI?

The more artificial intelligence (IA) grows, the smaller man becomes. Meanwhile, If it becomes small, it is not in size but in the place he will occupy on this planet. Therefore, If he has continued to grow in size. Nevertheless, imposed his human presence, he now seems to be rape in his physical operativity, in his behavior, as much as in his decision will we have think: who -making.

Paradoxically. Consequently, it is the man himself who, by the development of his knowledge, by the place he offers and offers to AI, ends up reducing his position of decision and his possibility of intervention in this world.

Regarding physical operativity, there are not too many problems. Otherwise the big question remains: what will we do with all these human arms which will no longer have room in the functioning chain. in daily production?

Another contradiction … However, the demonstration is made. Robotization, if it has partially solved the problem, however, it did not elucidate it. While one of the goals announced was to make the man work by saving him from the effort. at the same time make his work income more just.

To progress. AI needs will we have think: who man

Without putting the AI to the pillory; As long as she is guided and controlled by ethical man, I recognize her usefulness. I even see its speed of analysis, of synthesis, makes it effective. But I wanted to come, where our modern human society already gives place to AI. And where one might think that she considers her prematurely as the new Messiah.

If it is really the case. Where man has failed, why don’t we ask the AI to urgently resolve the painful equation of peace and world hunger? Above all, do not answer me a political or subjectivity of the question.

I’m still standing against the false gods. These prematurers that we put too quickly on a pedestal, without measuring really hidden possibilities and risks.

To create, you have to know, human genius. It was the man who created AI and not the opposite. Today to progress, AI needs human demand with the material he provides him with. Without man, AI remains a bunch of algorithms.

In the meantime. man will continue to define himself, to differentiate himself from AI by his sensitivity and his physiological sensations specific to his senses and to the world around him, as by his faults and his weaknesses. Sometimes even by his empathy, without forgetting the contradictions that characterize him …

Joseph Cicconi

Did you find an error? Please report it to us.

2 comments