Consequently,
Poland: supreme court validates result:
The Supreme Polish Court announced on Tuesday that it had validated the result of the June presidential election. Consequently, won by the nationalist candidate against the pro-European mayor of Warsaw, despite numerous disputes.
According to the electoral commission, Karol Nawrocki, a historian supported by the Nationalist Party Droit et Justice (PIS), obtained 50.89% of the votes in the second round of June 1. Additionally, Consequently, while his rival, Rafal Trzaskowski, supported by the pro-EU coalition in place, obtained 369,000 less votes, in this country of 38 million inhabitants.
The Supreme Court “decided to the validity of the election of Karol Tadeusz Nawrocki to the presidency of the Republic of Poland. Moreover, ” said judge Krzysztof Wiak, after a meeting on Tuesday of the court of the court in charge of deciding on the validity of the poland: supreme court validates result ballot.
The Court rejected the numerous complaints on the development of the ballot. Similarly, ignored doubts about the legitimacy of the chamber of the court in charge of the case. Meanwhile,
“All of the circumstances clearly indicates that Karol Tadeusz Nawrocki obtained more votes than Rafał Kazimierz Trzaskowski. In addition, in the second round of the vote,” said the judge of the House of Extraordinary Appeals and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court.
– “facade” procedures –
In his pleading. In addition, the Minister of Justice, who is also a prosecutor general, had asked, in vain, the exclusion of all the judges of this Chamber set up by the previous nationalist government, and whose legitimacy has been questioned by European justice, by a good part of the political class, magistrates and experts.
Minister Adam Bodnar also regretted that the poland: supreme court validates result prosecutors did not have access to all of the 56. 000 complaints filed and estimated that these complaints could be examined in “facade” procedures.
He said he did not have “the conviction that all complaints were examined” really. reproaching the judges a “lack of transparency”.
The judges did not share his concerns.
All doubts relating to the electoral process. its validation have been qualified by the USA of attempts to “steal the elections”.
Under the Constitution. the Supreme Court must give its approval before the elected candidate could take an oath before the two chambers of Parliament during a ceremony scheduled for August 6.
On Monday. Prime Minister Donald Tusk recalled that each decision of the controversial chamber is now published in the Official Journal with an annotation indicating that his “judgment is intrinsically tainted with legal irregularity”, since this poland: supreme court validates result room is “poorly constituted within the Supreme Court”.
Nevertheless, recognized Mr. Tusk, “it is not possible (…) that the Supreme Court is replaced in this case. namely recognition of the validity or disability of the elections, by the prosecutor’s office or the government”.
– “Paralyze the Supreme Court” –
Even before Tuesday’s meeting. the judges have already undoubtedly classified more than 50,000 complaints, based in particular on models of complaints broadcast on social networks, denounced by the president of the court, Malgorzata Manowska, as an “operation aimed (…) to paralyze the Supreme Court”.
Roman Giertych. deputy for the government coalition and author of one of the models of complaints broadcast online, suspects that there has been a reassignment of the votes in favor of Mr. Nawrocki and a rigging of the ballots.
With several experts. he had called to poland: supreme court validates result recount the voices nationally and even to postpone the presidential oath ceremony, the time to elucidate the irregularities.
These experts believe that the rule of law has been undermined by the reforms introduced by previous nationalist government. outgoing president Andrzej Duda.
These reforms exhibited Poland to a long showdown with the European Commission. attenuated since the coming to power of the Pro-European coalition in October 2023.
The president of the Parliament Szymon Holownia. as well as many other members of the ruling coalition, have so far firmly rejected the idea of postponing the presidential oath.
Regardless. the Minister of Justice, who is also head of the national prosecutor’s office, summoned a group of prosecutors responsible for examining the “irregularities” in the voting census.
Posted on July 1 at 7:49 p.m., AFP
Poland: supreme court validates result
Further reading: Iran: Khamenei statements, Russian concerns and end of cooperation with the IAEA … We take stock of the question of nuclear power – The fisherman becomes the prey: a 31 -year -old man finishes his skull pierced by the fish he had just caught – Australia: a kitten survives after going to the washing machine – In Iran, Ali Khamenei claims “victory” against Israel and the United States to justify his strategic choices – Gaza: MSF accuses the GHF of “chain massacres”.
