Meanwhile,
2 weeks, he asks chatgpt:
The flame return was not long in coming. In addition, The community of Openai subreddit, little known for its tenderness, has been unleashed. Consequently, The man had nothing in his hands. Moreover, Not a file, not a PDF, not even an image. In addition, Just textual promises of AI, which affirmed ” work on the project Like a zealous teleworking project manager.
In reality. Furthermore, the chatbot had produced nothing, but was content to respond with enthusiasm to each request, as if he knew what he was doing, reports PC Gamer.
« He tells you what you want to hear when you assign a role Will explain another user. Furthermore, “” He also made me: “The zip file will be available soon” ». Nevertheless, Another yet: ” If Chatgpt tells you that he is working on something in the background. Consequently, without a 2 weeks, he asks chatgpt dedicated progression bar, it is because he does not work at all. For example, You have to ask him everything, step by step ».
Emotional_stranger_5 defended it: he did not ask Chatgpt to write a book from nothing. Furthermore, The texts were him. Meanwhile, The AI was only supposed to streamline the sentences, add some images, give shape to its project. But when did he believe that AI could make a complete book. richly illustrated, without backup, without visual indication, without anything tangible?
Perhaps when the robot blew him, like an incantation: ” The document is ready to be downloaded ». Obviously, it was not.
To check the magnitude of the illusion. Tyler Wilde, editor in chief at PC Gamertried a similar experience: produce an illustrated version of Moby Dick With Chatgpt. The enthusiasm of the AI was flawless. She proposed a plan, asked for graphic preferences, evoked a model. 2 weeks, he asks chatgpt She even produced a ” example page ».
But as soon as it was a question of creating the whole book, return to square one. “” Advanced PDF generation tools are temporarily unavailable “Replied the machine, politely.
The revelation was brutal. But the aspirant author did not dismantle: ” I agree to have been duped “, He ended up writing. “” It was my first experience with an AI. and even if learning was tough, I am happy not to have spent several months there. Thank you to everyone who helped me open my eyes ».
Some commentators judged that he was learning the wrong lesson. In their eyes. the important thing was not to know how to better use Chatgpt, but to drop the AI and roll up your sleeves. “” If you don’t want to write a book, why would someone want to read it? One of them 2 weeks, he asks chatgpt lapidary. Another still recalled a spicy legal detail: ” Do not forget that the AI were trained on protected works. Your book may well contain stolen content ».
The story ready to smile. But it also reveals the strange relationship that we have with these technologies. Chatgpt is treated as a distracted genius, capable of miracles … when he does not forget what he does. Users oscillate between naive and excessive ambition. What is needed to create a cultural object that has a little soul-time. know-how, a dose of obstinacy-seems to have been replaced by the belief that a robot could do it in their place.
The lesson? Better to copy and paste, page after page, and illustrate yourself, even if it means spending some evenings there. The book will undoubtedly have fewer pages. But at least it will exist.
Photo credits: Stuart Caie CC by 2.0
By Nicolas Gary
Contact : [email protected]
2 weeks, he asks chatgpt
Further reading: Apple files a complaint against the informant who unveiled iOS 26 before the time – Sold less than 20 euros, what is Mini Cam ‘, the smallest camera in the world? – Extended care in Cancer of the Metastatic HR+/HER2 Non -resortable or Metastatic – This Ultra Popular Nintendo Switch game download site has just fallen – Amazon sacrifices the Prix de la Philips Oneblade to complete the Prime Day 2025.
