A deputy wants to continue Bayrou and two senior officials for “perjury”

“You are the only authorized to seize the judicial authority”: the deputy LFI Paul Vannier. Similarly, co-rapporteur of the commission of inquiry into the violence in educational establishments, asked the president of this commission of inquiry, Fatiha Keloua-Hachi, to seize justice for “false testimony” against three people auditioned during this commission, including the Prime Minister. In addition to François Bayrou. Therefore, the co -rapporteur of this commission of inquiry points to a letter obtained by AFP and also consulted by 20 Minutes Caroline Pascal and Georges-François Leclerc, respectively director of school education and ex-prefect of the North.

Contacted by AFP. Meanwhile, Fatiha Keloua-Hachi said he wanted to talk to the two corapporters, Paul Vannier and Violette Spillebout (Renaissance), to discuss the substance of the stated remarks, and verify that it is empowered to seize justice. Furthermore, According to the ordinance of November deputy wants continue bayrou two 17. However, 1958 which governed the investigation commissionsprosecution for false testimony “are exercised at the request of the President of the Commission or, when the report of the Commission was published, at the request of the Office of the Assembly concerned”. But problem: for the moment. Fatiha Keloua-Hachi does not seem to see any perjury in the words of François Bayrou. “What describes as perjury to him, the president does not identify him as such,” said those around her.

Questionable declarations on a defamation complaint – Deputy wants continue bayrou two

What are the words accused? Asked about a possible defamation complaint announced on February 11. François Bayrou said during the commission of inquiry that he intended to file a complaint against the Médiapart site, which had announced that he had “given a million euros to Betharram”. However. this article only appeared on March 12one month after the deputy wants continue bayrou two initial announcement of a defamation complaint filing, argues Paul Vannier, who considers that this declaration “constitutes a false testimony”. But was François Bayrou simply appointing Médiapart. or indicating that he intended to file a complaint for these words?

The fact remains that many of the Prime Minister’s oaths under oath contradicted his remarks made in the National Assembly. especially when he had claimed before parliamentarians having “never been informed of anything of violence or violence a fortiori sexual”, and which he had then claimed before the commission of inquiry ” [des violences] before the articles of the local press ”. The deputy also underlines that “certain declarations under the oath of judge Christian Mirande. the gendarme Alain Hontangs contradict those of the Prime Minister pronounced under the same conditions”.

A prefect who contradicts his minister

Regarding Caroline Pascal. director of school education and ex-director of the General Inspectorate of Education, Paul Vannier criticizes her for having declared about a report on the Catholic establishment Stanislas that the inspectors had “not spotted systemic homophobia, or even institutional” since “the many testimonies that had been noted as teachers like students did not mention them”. A declaration “contradicted” by “minutes of hearings of students. parents of students annexed to the report […] of which Madame Pascal cannot ignore the content to have signed the transmission letter. ”

Regarding the prefect Georges-François Leclerc. Paul Vannier highlights his words Affirming to have taken “the decision to terminate the contract” between the State and the Muslim Lycée Averroès, in contradiction with a press point by the Minister of the Interior Bruno Retailleau at the end deputy wants continue bayrou two of April. The Minister stressed that the prefect had acted “by decision and order of the government”.