Meanwhile,
Ai would make doctors lose:
For years. Consequently, artificial intelligence has been presented as a major asset for medicine, capable of improving diagnostics, refining medical imaging or even contributing, according to some enthusiasts, to find one day the mythical remedy against cancer. Meanwhile, But a study published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology comes to throw a cold: doctors who regularly use. Furthermore, AI could lose efficiency when they have to work without it.
The “Google Maps Effect” applied to medicine
The study was carried out as part of the Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Cancer Prevention (ACCT) program. Therefore, funded by the European Commission and Japan. Similarly, Four endoscopy centers in Poland participated. Consequently, equipped in 2021 with AI tools intended to detect polyps – growths that can be benign or precancerous. The researchers compared the quality of 1. 443 colonoscopies made without AI (out of a ai would make doctors lose total of 2,177) before and after the introduction of technology.
Result: three months before the arrival of the AI. the rate of detection of adenomas (ADR), a key indicator of quality, reached approximately 28 %. Three months later, this rate fell to 22 % when doctors worked without assistance, even though AI increased performance when activated.
For Marcin Romańczyk. co -author of the study, the phenomenon is similar to “Google Maps Effect”: ” Imagine that you had to guide yourself without GPS: you quickly lose the habit of reading a card. It’s similar here. Researchers evoke a natural tendency to rest on decision -making systems. which would reduce concentration, motivation and sense of responsibility in the absence of the machine.
Omer Ahmad. gastroenterologist consultant at the University College Hospital in London, believes that regular exposure to AI could weaken essential skills, such as visual recognition of patterns or reflexes for ai would make doctors lose the search for anomalies. Diagnostic confidence could also be affected, as is dexterity in manipulation of the coloscope.
However, some experts invite to qualify. It is thus underlined that the total number of procedures increased during the study. which could have induce fatigue and influenced on performance. Furthermore. automation means – this tendency to trust systems too much – is not specific to AI: any new technology has this risk.
The ethical question is above all whether we want to trust AI than humans. To Omer Ahmad. it is not only a question of monitoring technology, but of ” preserve essential skills in a world where AI will be omnipresent ».
Clearly. AI promises to improve screening, but it could also, if it is poorly integrated, weaken the skills it is supposed to assist. The solution is difficult to find: a subtle balance between technological aid and the expertise of ai would make doctors lose humans.
🟣 To not miss any news on the Geek newspaper, subscribe to Google News and on our WhatsApp. And if you love us, we have a newsletter every morning.
Ai would make doctors lose
Further reading: Towards the possible freezing of the “PowerShip” project of the CEB – Khalil Elahee: “The barge is an option that remains expensive and complex” – A major advance in the fight against malaria – These 4 signs that must alert you – These adored fruits to absolutely avoid in periods of strong heat! – Here is the black list of drugs to flee in 2025, judged “more dangerous than use”.
