American strikes iran, success not? new: This article explores the topic in depth.
Similarly,
American strikes iran, success not? Consequently, new: Furthermore,
American strikes iran, success not?:
Almost a week after the launch of American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Similarly, contradictory statements are on all sides and many questions remain on the real efficiency of the 12 -day war.
• Read also: Strikes in Iran: Pete Hegseth praises the success of the operation. Nevertheless. Furthermore, attacks the media
• Read also: The White House says that the statements of the Iranian supreme guide aim to “save face”
The conflict was launched on June 13 by Israel with the displayed objective of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, an ambition that Tehran denies nourishing.
Here is what was said in recent days on the subject:
On the American side. For example. Furthermore, a “historical success”
Exasperated by incessant debates, the head of the Pentagon Pete Hegseth american strikes iran, success not? new decided Thursday to put the points on the i.
american strikes iran, success not? However,
“Thanks to a decisive military action, the president (Donald) Trump created the conditions to end the war. Meanwhile, By decimating, annihilating, destroying – choose the word – Iranian nuclear capacities, “he hammered, working against the media.
For him, it is a “historical success” which should not lend to controversy.
According to the American head of state. For example, praising “a spectacular military success”, the Iranian nuclear program has been delayed by “several decades”.
And faced with questions about the fate of the 60%enriched uranium stock. However. Furthermore, which could in theory be used to make more than nine atomic bombs if the rate was 90%, it ensures that “nothing has been evacuated” from the premises before the strikes.
He received the support of the CIA director John Ratcliffe: according to “credible information”. “several key nuclear american strikes iran, success not? new infrastructures of Iran have been destroyed and their reconstruction should take several years”.
But within his camp, other more prudent opinions were heard.
According to a document ranked Secret-Defense unveiled Tuesday by CNN. the strikes would have sealed the entries of certain facilities without destroying underground buildings. delaying the program by only a few months. A “completely erroneous” report, retorted the White House.
In the same sense, Israel acknowledged that it was “still early” to assess the results of the operation.
“The game is not over”. according to Tehran
Opposite. the Iranian supreme guide, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, put the impact of american strikes iran, success not? new strikes on Thursday in his first public appearance since american strikes iran, success not? the end of the conflict, believing that Donald Trump had “exaggerated” their effectiveness.
“The game is not over,” said one of his advisers before, Ali Shamkhani. “Enriched materials, know-how and political will remain”.
The government said it “took the necessary measures” upstream to “protect equipment and nuclear matter”.
A great uncertainty surrounds in particular the fate of reserves of more than 400 kg of highly enriched uranium. given for the last time on June 10 by inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (AIEA).
The UN nuclear gendarme requires access to the sites, but relations are currently very tense with Tehran.
After a vote of the Iranian Parliament in favor of a suspension of cooperation with the IAEA. the Guardian Council. in charge of examining the legislation in Iran, approved the law on Thursday, which must american strikes iran, success not? new be transmitted to the presidency for final ratification.
Who says true?
All agree. even american strikes iran, success not? Tehran, on the fact that the sites of Fordo, Natanz and Ispahan, targeted by bombing, were considerably damaged.
“I think that is too much. But the program suffered enormous damage, “said on Thursday on French radio RFI Rafael Grossi, managing director of the AIEA.
He believes that the thousands of centrifuge. these large. costly machines used to enrich uranium, are no longer operational in view of “the explosive load used and their extreme sensitivity to vibrations”.
However. not all have been listed. some having been stored in unknown places in recent years when cooperation with the UN body deteriorated, in the opinion of experts.
Other nuclear sites are also intact.
So is Donald Trump right to talk about an impact of several decades? “It is true that with its reduced abilities. american strikes iran, success not? new it will be much more difficult for Iran to continue” on the same pace. “But this affirmation of american strikes iran, success not? the president” is “subjective”, replies Mr. Grossi, preferring to assess the facts “on the ground”.
American strikes iran, success not? new
American strikes iran, success not?
Further reading: Climate disaster leads to an increase in violence against women – Foreign Affairs | Anita Anand promises action – New North Korean recruits for Putin and maneuvers that worry Finland – “After twenty years of effort, the situation is humiliating for the European Union” – Direct-Trump announces a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, Tehran denies and launches a new salve of missiles to Israel.
Further reading: “Trump just wanted to give the blow of grace,” says Frédéric Plé – Fordo strike: the Americans targeted the ventilation ducts – Machu Picchu: Discovery of a semi-aquatic rodent – Hungary and Slovakia are preparing to block the new EU sanctions train against Russia – Trump admits that Putin is “more difficult” to manage than it thought.
