Design and screens: characteristics that are equal
The first notable difference between these two smartphones lies in their general design, and more precisely in their external screens. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 retains the philosophy of its predecessor, the Z Flip 6, with an external screen with comfortable dimensions (4.1 inch) and offering good readability for notifications and widgets.
Opposite, the Motorola Razr 60 has an almost as imposing external slab, with a 3.6 -inch diagonal. This display surface allows more complete use without having to open the phone, to consult applications or respond to messages in a fluid manner.
Regarding the internal screen, the two devices offer high quality tiles. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 benefits from a 6.9 -inch LTPO 2X 2X 2x slab which guarantees vibrant colors, excellent brightness and an adaptive refresh rate up to 120 Hz. The Motorola Razr 60 is almost as good, with its LTPO AMOLED Full HD+ 6.9 -inch panel, with an adaptive cooling rate.
The hinge, a central element of the foldable, is also optimized on the two models to minimize the fold, although traces remain a subject of discussion.
Performances and power: advantage to the Samsung chip
In terms of performance, Samsung seems to have a technical lead. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, a specially optimized version for its devices, which guarantees high -level performance for resource -gourmet tasks such as multitasking or video games. This configuration gives it a significantly higher calculation capacity and power than most of its rivals.
For its part, the Motorola Razr 60 is equipped with a MediaTek Dimensity 7400X chip engraved in 4 Nm, which offers excellent fluidity for daily use and a satisfactory user experience, but which could show its limits in front of the Z Flip 7 processor on the heaviest tasks.
This more accessible processor choice allows Motorola to offer a more attractive price while offering very correct performance for the majority of users. It will therefore be a question of choosing between raw power and the value for money.
Photography and autonomy: different approaches
The photo remains a decisive purchase criterion. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 incorporates a configuration similar to that of its elder, the Z Flip 6, with a main sensor of 50 megapixels and an ultra-angle of 12 megapixels. The quality of the pictures is reinforced by the image processing of Samsung, which has proven itself over the generations.
The Motorola Razr 60 also offers a 50 megapixel main sensor associated with an ultra-angle of 13 megapixels with macro vision, a functionality absent from the Z flip 7. This option gives a clear advantage to the Razr 60 for portrait photography or remote shots.
On the battery side, the two phones have made efforts to improve autonomy. The Z Flip 7 has a battery of 4174 mAh, a capacity that helps it hold a full day, and supports the fast load at 25W. As for the Motorola Razr 60, it offers greater endurance with its 4,500 mAh battery compatible with fast load at 30W.
Price and conclusion: what choice to make?
The central point of the comparison lies in the question of price and value for money. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 is positioned as a premium model with a substantial rate: from € 1202.5. For its part, the Motorola Razr 60 seeks to democratize the foldable format with a more accessible starting price: € 899. This aggressive positioning makes RAZR 60 a size competitor.
So, is the Motorola Razr 60 better than the Galaxy Z Flip 7? The answer is not easy. If you are looking for the highest processing power, a very successful software ecosystem with the Galaxy AI functions, and a generally more stable resale value, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 represents the best choice.
On the other hand, if you favor an original design with distinctive finishes, and an excellent experience at a considerably lower price, the Motorola Razr 60 is a very relevant choice. He manages to offer most of a modern foldable smartphone without major concessions.
This makes it an extremely attractive option for those who wish to join the universe of valves without leaving all their savings.