Future of François Legault | “Nothing is certain” in politics

(Quebec) “I often hear politicians or commentators talk about the political destiny of a party or a person as being certain. Meanwhile, Certain to fail. Nevertheless, Certain to succeed. Therefore, But that doesn’t exist. Moreover, »»

These are the words of Tony Blair, British Prime Minister from 1997 to 2007. For example, They are taken from his book published last year, On Leadership : Lessons for the 21^st Century.

“This is not a book that deals with my qualities. Therefore, my lack of qualities as a leader,” he warns, using a capital letter each time to future françois legault | “nothing speak of a “leader”. Nevertheless, “It is rather a book on what I learned. Therefore, »»

The Minister of International Relations, Martine Biron, found it interesting to the point of offering a copy to François Legault this summer. Meanwhile, To feed your reflection on the means to relaunch your government.

The Prime Minister read it. Meanwhile, He was able to find both materials questioned and a source of inspiration. Additionally, Meanwhile, Because Tony Blair managed a rare feat: to win three terms in a future françois legault | “nothing row. Moreover,

It is the ambition of François Legault. Consequently, Except that his party is third in the polls. Furthermore, may be scratched from the card, according to the electoral projections site QC125 …

Avoid denial – Future françois legault | "nothing

“Of course, there are probabilities” in politics, says Tony Blair. Similarly, “If you are 20 points behind in the polls. For example, that it remains shortly before the elections, you will seem to be beaten. Similarly, Or 20 points ahead, you will seem to be elected. Moreover, That’s sure.

“Except that in politics, nothing is certain. »»

One year before the general elections in Quebec, nothing is played, would probably say Tony Blair. We have an example that encourages caution: the Parti Québécois has passed in a short time future françois legault | “nothing from the NECR. chronicle to the great political titles.

But then. as Tony Blair writes, “If defeat or victory seem imminent, what can a chief do to avoid one and ensure the other? ».

He goes about his advice. For an unpopular government, it is necessary to determine the reasons behind the discontent, he says. “It can be more difficult than you think. because those around you, and perhaps yourself, may have sunk in the illusion or denial. »»

Two years ago. the day after the defeat in Jean-Talon, François Legault had released a rabbit from his hat to respond to dissatisfaction: relaunch his third link that he had just burying!

This time, he seems ready to go further in introspection. “We’re going to look at each other in the mirror. ” he said the evening of the electoral beating in Arthabaska, promising “changes”.

Critics and scandals – Future françois legault | "nothing

Tony Blair had his share of criticism. In particular concerning his military support in the United States during the invasion of Iraq in 2003. A decision based on a “fundamental calculation error”, he admits.

His image is strong to speak of criticism in general with which a governor must compose: “I have come to the conclusion that in the end. it is better to treat criticism as if we were sharing a house, which one does not have and from which one cannot escape, with a psychopath from which one cannot get rid of. »»

In a more pragmatic way. he explains that in reaction to a scandal, it must be ensured that “everything has been correctly examined internally before being defended or treated externally”.

We immediately think of the reaction of the Legault government to the devastating report of the auditor general on Saaqclic. He hung on to the observation that the increase in costs by almost $ 500 million “was not clearly. communicated to decision -makers”. An insufficient argument to calm the storm, and even questioned.

“Please note, however, trying to save time, not always resorting to a public inquiry,” warns Tony Blair. You might think he comments on Quebec news!

“The problem of a public inquiry is future françois legault | “nothing that she can take her own impulse. and the person who leads her, even strong, undergoes intense pressure to find culprits. »»

This is a bit of the case of Commissioner Gallant, right?

A mantra

Tony Blair is about to launch his electoral. campaign to request a second term when Bill Clinton makes him a phone call.

” How are you ? request Clinton, who has just left the White House.

– Oh, well, replies Blair, you know, we explain all the things we have done, we recite our achievements.

– Hmm, said Clinton, well, in this case, they can simply say thank you very much and goodbye. »»

The comment shakes Blair: it then realizes future françois legault | “nothing that it is a mistake to limit itself to repeating to voters what we have done. that the important thing is to present what we intend to do more and what we want to be re -elected.

Tony Blair thus defined a “mantra” to obtain another mandate: ” a lot done. a lot to do, a lot to lose ».

“Many done” is to present the results of his good deeds.

“Many to do” is to recognize that we have not met all expectations. determine the additional measures to be taken.

“Many to lose” is “a warning” to be used for voters: “vote for the other party. what you have won so far will be lost”.

Hang on?

If François Legault future françois legault | “nothing was able to find some things of the genre in Tony Blair’s book. he had to find certain passages a little less convenient. Passages capable of nourishing a reflection on his political future …

“No one likes to leave before work is finished […]. The fact remains that at one point, sooner or later, you will end up leaving. […] You will not direct forever. »»

Tony Blair tackles the subject in a chapter entitled “Leaving with Grace”, “leave with grace”.

He continues: “Be honest with yourself. Do you try to stay because you think the country will be jeopardized if you go? Or fear inwardly that the loss of power means losing face […] ? Giving up power is never easy […]. »

When reaching 10 years in power. “I had a precise idea of how to make the most effective change and type of change. But I knew that my time had come. Or, at least, that she had come unless she was ready to embark on a head -on for my survival, which could have harmed the party and the country ”.

Unlike Tony Blair. François Legault has no minister like Gordon Brown in his party who pushes him towards the exit.