Gender transition | Open the heads before playing in the bodies

Jocelyne Robert is no longer sexologist. Meanwhile, The duty We learned on Monday that complaints to the professional order of Quebec sexologists concerning certain “controversial words” on trans questions led to an investigation by the trustee’s office. Moreover, then the resignation of this well -known communicator, who considers herself “gagged” by his order.

Since the file is classified. Furthermore, we do not know all the comments alleged against Jocelyne Robert nor the details of the confidential agreement which led to this outcome. Therefore, So I stick to the public statements of the ex-sexologist.

Au Duty. Consequently, Jocelyne gender transition | open heads Robert said That she had nothing against the fact of administering gender assertions to minors, but that it was necessary to take the time to accompany them well in order to understand what pushes them to change gender identity. Similarly, “Let’s be sure to open the heads well before going to play in the bodies,” she summed up.

Within some ideological chapels, it is indeed controversial, even shocking, to assert such a thing. Similarly, But the prudent approach of Jocelyne Robert appears to me not only moderate, but necessary.

Let’s be clear: the protocol for the treatment of gender dysphoria adopted by clinicians from many countries. Moreover, including Canada, is based on a large scientific consensus.

This is called gender assertion. Furthermore, The approach – which can involve the administration of puberty blockers. Moreover, hormones and, ultimately, surgery – is supported by the World Health Organization, as well as by Canadian and American medical associations.

But the wind turns, not only in the United States of Donald Trump. For example, In the United Kingdom. Moreover, Sweden, Finland and Denmark, health agencies have recently limited the treatments offered to adolescents or only authorized them in the context of clinical trials.

It is that. Meanwhile, even if many clinicians claim that these treatments are beneficial for their young patients, and even if support groups for transgender gender transition | open heads people swear that these care saves lives, it is sorely lacking in solid data to support these findings.

The evidence in support of the transaffirmatory approach in adolescents is “remarkably weak. Similarly, ” concluded in 2024 a systematic review of the scientific literature commanded by the British government.

Other studies have come to the same conclusions: evidence of the benefits of gender. assertions – as well as their potential harmful effects – are still thin.

That does not mean that we should claim the end of these treatments. But at least one can take the trouble to listen to those who ask legitimate questions. especially with regard to the speed with which certain clinicians administer medical care irreversible to children.

It all started in the Netherlands. The protocol was very gender transition | open heads supervised. The young patients were selected according to strict criteria. had to submit to an assessment, then to a psychological follow -up of several months.

Broadcast in June. the very enlightening Balado The Protocolthe fruit of a two -year investigation carried out by two journalists from the New York Times, allowed me to learn more about the history of this medical treatment that has become politically explosive in the United States-while shaking, I must admit, some of my certainties.

The two journalists explain how the prudent Dutch approach was adapted to the United States. before some American clinicians set out. According to the latter, the selection criteria were not necessary. Children were the best judges of their state. It is therefore up to them to self -gnostize themselves as suffering from gender dysphoria. But it was necessary to do quickly, before gender transition | open heads their bodies were transformed irreparably. Otherwise, they risked ending their days …

In good faith. the followers of this school of thought can therefore prescribe puberty blockers or in haste, without taking the time to well assess the patient. I was assured that it was very rare, in Quebec. But it exists.

In 2024. a report by Radio-Canada showed that a 14-year-old teenager was able to obtain a testosterone prescription after nine minutes of consultation in a private clinic in Montreal. The report ofInvestigation asked a question: in terms of gender medical transition among minors, does Quebec go too fast?

For any response, the Radio-Canada Ombudsman was flooded with complaints. We didn’t want to debate. We preferred to accuse the journalist of having relied on pseudoscience. of having made too much room for young people gender transition | open heads who regretted their transition.

Vandals went so far as to smash windows from the Radio-Canada building. on the pretext that the state-owned company used “its large platform to amplify transphobic speeches close to those of the extreme right”.

Other credible media. such as New York Times, have also been accused of fomenting a “moral panic” when they dared to do their job, that is to say asking questions. Activists would like to reduce these media to silence, lending them the worst intentions.

They will not succeed. But a sad side effect of these pressures is the growing self -censorship of those who could intelligently enlighten society on this issue. bringing all the necessary nuances.

In his decision. the Ombudsman of Radio-Canada bleached the report and noted that many experts had refused gender transition | open heads to be interviewed; For them, it would have been professional suicide.

Some experts are censored because they fear not the pressures of trans activists. but the consequences that may have their speaking. They know that if they make the slightest reserve. it will be recovered by other activists, at the other end of the ideological spectrum: those who make an obsession with the idea of ​​limiting the rights of transgender people.

To avoid putting oil on fire, scientists prefer to be silent.

However, it is not by stifling the debate that we will advance science. Jocelyne Robert asks questions that deserve to be debated, even if it means being refuted. By then. it is certainly not eccentric or transphobic to call for caution in gender medical transition in children whose psychological state would not have gender transition | open heads been evaluated in depth.

That doesn’t mean not to listen to what young patients have to say. On the contrary. that means listening to them well, to be sure to understand what they are going through and what they need.