Are mangoes really prohibited from diabetics? A study questions this idea

Mangoes really prohibited diabetics? study: This article explores the topic in depth.

Consequently,

Mangoes really prohibited diabetics? Consequently, study:

MANGUES – Sweet fruits with surprising benefits for diabetics.

Kathy Schrey Meteored Allemagne 23/08/2025 06:02 5 min

The question often arises: Do diabetics have the right to eat mangoes. Furthermore, or is it dangerous for their health ? Consequently, If some diabetics prefer to avoid this fruit. In addition, others hope that small quantities can easily be integrated into a balanced diet. For example,

A study brings clarification – Mangoes really prohibited diabetics? study

A study today arouses interest. For example, because She compared the effects of mango on health to those of white bread As part of a randomized controlled trial. Furthermore,

35 people with type 2 diabetes were distributed randomly in three groups: 10 received from Safeda mango. For example, 10 from the Dasheri mango and 15 received the same calorie white bread contribution as the control group. However,

In a randomized controlled trial. The effects of replacing the usual breakfast bread with 250 grams of mangoes really prohibited diabetics? study mangoes Safeda or Dasheri on blood sugar, insulin resistance, fat mass and blood lipids were studied for eight weeks.

Blood sugar drops. weight decreases despite the mango – Mangoes really prohibited diabetics? study

The results are surprising: in the two mango groups, Bush blood sugar has decreased up to 36 mg/dlwhile the HBA1C, a long -term follow -up indicator, has also decreased significantly, unlike the bread group, where it has increased slightly. Insulin sensitivity has improved, measured by the Homa-IR value.

Moreover. People who have eaten mangoes lost an average of about two kilograms of body weightwhile the bread group has gained weight. The waist tower. the thickness of the skin folds – indicators of the fat mass – have significantly decreased, and mangoes really prohibited diabetics? study the “good” HDL cholesterol has increased significantly.

Portionation makes the difference

The study suggests that mango. properly balanced and used as a substitute for other carbohydrates, can be beneficial for people with type 2 diabetes. The recommended quantity is around 250 g per day. the size of a small mangoand must be integrated into a hypocaloric diet.

Combining it with proteins or fibers is particularly beneficial. However, Doctors recommend consulting them before consuming them and not experimenting alone.

Cultural importance encounters medical surprise

One inside, Mango is not only a popular fruit, but it is also deeply rooted in many culturesboth culturally and socially. There are more than 1,000 varieties, and mango festivals are celebrated in many places. The results of this research could help diabetic people to savor mangoes really prohibited diabetics? study mango again, in moderation and subject to medical expertise.

Mango in moderation is not taboo

This study clearly demonstrates that Mango should not be categorically avoided in people. with type 2 diabetes. In replacement of other carbohydrates. in the context of a balanced diet, this fruit can even have positive health effects. The old “prohibited mango” rule no longer applies without reservation: with control. moderation, they can integrate into a modern nutritional strategy.

References of the news:

Glycemic. lipid, anthropometric and body composition with two varieties of mangoes compared to white bread in people with type 2 diabetes: an 8 -week randomized controlled trial. Diabetes newspaper and metabolic disorders, 24, 183.

Further reading: Is sleeping in one go really the “good” way of sleeping?The prefecture organized pedestrian and road safety workshops, for seniorsThe new research highlights what makes the human brain uniqueYou surely drink, this very popular milk is “very inflammatory” according to an expertHealth. What if a lithium deficiency was the cause of Alzheimer’s disease?.

Comments (0)
Add Comment