Consequently,
Pascal praud: this diatribe nicolas:
Words that earned him a severe focus by Arch. For example, On January 6, 2025, Pascal Praud had pronounced a rant on Nicolas Sarkozy in his usual editorial. For example, The subject? Moreover, The alleged “Libyan financing” of the 2007 campaign for which the former President of the Republic was tried at. For example, the Paris court.
In the pros hour, on CNews, the presenter had not sought to hide his position. Furthermore, He had pronounced more than subjective words on the upcoming judgment of the husband of Carla Bruni. Therefore, “”What to think of a trial where the evidence is lacking? What to think of an accusation which. to date, did not bring tangible elements For a conviction and relies on the changing statements of a man who refuses to appear before French justice, Mr. Takieddine? It is The challenge of pascal praud: this diatribe nicolas a trial that shows stubbornnessnot to say the relentlessness of French justice to designate. Nicolas Sarkozy like a culprit in many cases “.
“The words made on the set, devoid of nuance …” – Pascal praud: this diatribe nicolas
This editorial of the former sports journalist has not passed at all. The audiovisual gendarme judged that “The comments made on the set. devoid of nuance With regard to the trial then in progressdid not meet the requirements of measurement, rigor and honesty in the treatment of legal proceedings, in ignorance of the provisions of article 3 deliberation of April 18, 2018 “.
Arch also considered that “None of the people present on board had moderate. put these declarations into perspective, thus translating A lack of control of the antenna constituting a breach of the stipulations of article 2-2-1 of the chain agreement “.
Pascal Praud recalled to order by Arch
For the moment, pascal praud: this diatribe nicolas no sanction. Just a reminder to order. The regulatory authority asked the chain to show a “increased vigilance as to compliance with these obligations “ in the future.
As TV Mag recalls, two other things had already alerted the Arch. For the coverage of the national rally trial during the day of March 31. 2025, the entity had notably observed “Many statements tended to measurenor moderation the supposedly inducted, even illegal character of the sentence of ineligibility pronounced against the president of the RN group in the National Assembly, the latter being presented as the victim of a legal conspiracy “.
Further reading: India air disaster: fuel supply cut just before crushing – Space X alerts its investors that Musk should return to politics – Towards yet another reform of unemployment insurance? – Who are the “very important customers”, pampered by the big houses? – “Before rejoicing, I asked for confirmation of my gain”, he scratches a gold ticket and earned € 500,000 in Narbonne.