A pursuit of $ 1.5 million against the DPJ Mauricie-Center-du-Québec

The Directorate of Youth Protection (DPJ) of Mauricie-Center-du-Québec faces a civil prosecution of $ 1.5 million brought by a parent who estimates that he was injured by the organization. Meanwhile,

The parent claims $ a million in punitive damage, $ 165,000 for loss of salary, lawyer and psychologist. However, The prosecution also requires $ 400. Moreover, 000 in moral damage for the loss of relationship with children and the treatment of which the parent was the victim. Moreover, The parent has not seen his children since December 2024.

The pursuit alleys that the DPJ has shown gross negligence. Similarly, She criticizes him for having slopped his work and that it is such a heavy fault that it requires compensation. In pursuit $ 1.5 million against addition, The plaintiff claims that the DPJ in Trois-Rivières has a pathological organizational culture.

In order to respect the current legal process. However, the confidentiality rules protecting the identity of children, the DPJ preferred not to comment and deposit elements in response to the pursuit. Furthermore,

A conflict between parents – Pursuit $ 1.5 million against

In 2017, the DPJ intervenes in a conflict between two parents in separation. Nevertheless, The confrontation was so serious that the children are in the middle of a loyalty conflict which places them. pursuit $ 1.5 million against Therefore, at risk of psychological ill -treatment. Moreover,

After a year of intervention. However, a few months after recognizing that the situation was very serious, the DPJ closes the file, without giving any reason. For example,

The plaintiff claims that it is then that she began to know problems. Furthermore, She believes that the other parent managed to manipulate the speakers to convince them that she is an alienating parent. Furthermore, She believes that the speakers lack training to take care of cases like hers.

In the pursuit, it is indicated that it was systematically discredited, rejected, put aside, devalued in front of the children.

The DPJ humiliated [la partie demanderesse] in front of the children.

The DPJ made an unworthy. Similarly, inaccurate portrait of [la partie demanderesse] In front of the children and in front of the court, without forgetting in front of the school of children, the day camp of children and professionals gravitating around the familyis it indicated. However, The parent has the impression that the DPJ broken the confidentiality of his file.

The lawyer for the plaintiff. Nevertheless, Me Vivan Nguyen, believes that the pursuit $ 1.5 million against DPJ married the cause of a parent, to the detriment of the other.

In the pursuit. we can read that work notes of stakeholders in DPJ indicate that children do not like the plaintiff for the comments of the other parent. Despite this, the reports for loyalty conflict and alienating behavior are closed without explanation.

The plaintiff alleys that stakeholders have witnessed violent behavior on the part of the other parent. that the DPJ has received reports from neutral third parties that have not been selected. Everyone pursuit $ 1.5 million against has pointed out and they strive to say that it is I who is not correctshe deplores.

The parent believes that he has lost seven unexpected years with his children. that part of the crystallized relationship with them is difficult to remedy. I am traumatizedhe says.

Pursuit $ 1.5 million against

Allegation of fake diagnoses

The pursuit alleys that the DPJ has issued fake mental health diagnoses about it. In the file, it was indicated that the parent suffered from personality disorder and anxious disorder. He says he does not suffer from mental disorders. He asked for private expertise from a psychiatrist who confirmed that he does not suffer from any pathology. The parent claims that the stakeholders refused to consult this pursuit $ 1.5 million against expert report. Holding false information in the file has influenced the court believes the prosecution. If they do not want to listen to the speech of the experts. I do not know who to trust, but it is notsays the plaintiff.

The defendant party claims that one of the children has serious difficulties in school. School bulletins confirm repeated failures and behavioral problems. The parent asks the other to place the child in a specialized school, which he refuses. The plaintiff makes a report for educational negligence. There DPJ And the Chemin-du-Roy school service center argue that the child has a very good school journey. that everything is fine, while the documents demonstrate the opposite.

Arduous procedures

In June 2025. the pursuit $ 1.5 million against parent took an approach to ask the DPJ to pay his legal costs because he says he can no longer do the means to do so. This request was rejected by the judge. but the actions of the DPJ During the hearing left him a bitter taste.

The father of the plaintiff has helped finance part of the lawyers’ fees. He is 81 years old, has a heart condition and is in terminal phase of cancer. In order to confirm this information before the Court while sparing the elderly. the lawyer produced a notarial document in which the father recognizes that his child has a debt to him. There DPJ refused to accept the document. claimed that the man at the end of his life comes to testify in court, even if he lives more than two hours drive from the courthouse.

During this hearing. for an hour, the DPJ Mauricie-Center-du-Québec refused to recognize the fact that she is under supervision, and then recognize that she is actually under supervision, but not specifically in the file of the plaintiff.

The DPJ At immunity

The law gives the Directorate of Youth Protection Immunity against civil proceedings. pursuit $ 1.5 million against However. the lawyer for the plaintiff, Vivan Nguyen, believes that it is possible to demonstrate that in this file, the DPJ acted so incompetently that immunity must be lifted. She believes that the DPJ must be attributable, because at the moment, the DPJ does what she wantsshe denounces.

Twice in the past, judgments have condemned the DPJ Paying damages, but these judgments were broken on appeal. Me Nguyen believes that this pursuit $ 1.5 million against cause could go to the Supreme Court since it is of public interest to determine if the DPJ indeed has complete immunity. even when it acts with gross incompetence.

The plaintiff knows that the fight will be difficult. but she wishes to do it for all parents who believe that the DPJ has committed serious mistakes.

A supervisory organization

This prosecution comes in a difficult context for the DPJ Mauricie-Center-du-Québec. Minister Lionel Carmant put it under supervision on October 9. 2024, following revelations contained pursuit $ 1.5 million against in a report by the Human Rights and Youth Rights Commission.

In a passage of the report. we report that In several files, information is omitted, manipulated or invented in order to take parents in defaultand that in the majority of cases, stakeholders did not use any clinical tools to support their decisions and ensure that they are objective.

The plaintiff argues that the bad practices pursuit $ 1.5 million against of the DPJ Mauricie-Center-du-Québec are even perpetuated under the supervision. There is nothing changing, it’s even worseshe says.