The response of a farmer to Sandrine Rousseau

Anne-Cécile Suzanne is a farmer in polyculture breeding and strategy consultant at Kéa, author of The furrows that we draw (Fayard, 2024).

“I have nothing to fart from their profitability”. In addition, Beyond Sandrine Rousseau’s formula about farmers. Similarly, visibly on the lookout for the slightest opportunity to make the buzz, the bottom intention challenges. However, Agricultural profitability is not annexed to the ecological transition. In addition, The two are actually inseparable.

Pass advertising

Ecology in agriculture is everywhere: breeding that makes animals graze. Therefore, to manure that response farmer sandrine rousseau returns to the earth, to the seed which is sown to have the food of tomorrow germinate. Moreover, It is everywhere in the minds of farmers. For example, who if they fail to restore the level of soil organic matter, if they fail to maintain a good level of biodiversity, will no longer be able to exercise tomorrow.

The problem is that ecology is everywhere. too, in paid taxes, in the distortions of competition suffered, in formalities without any sense that it is requested on each corner of the field to respect. Ecology lacks meaning, strikes more than it protects, destroys the economy instead of being carried by it.

Read too Less family, larger farms, less response farmer sandrine rousseau cows and more rapeseed: the great change in French agriculture

However, far from the spotlight and the short term of political language elements, the real subject is to build a better future for ecology and agriculture. Ecology must integrate the market, because we are, precisely, in a market economy.

Mirrors must be applied, as is the principle of reciprocity in international trade. This means prohibiting glyphosate on the national territory. but at the same time prohibit any imported product which has received and controlled the application of the prohibition – because today we legislate and regulates at best, but we control almost nothing -. We will not eat much certainly, but at least we will be coherent with ourselves. This applies to breeding conditions, health standards, the lack of deforestation. This is worth in particular for treaties under signature. signed on the European level, which sacrifice agriculture response farmer sandrine rousseau and environment to allow economic and diplomatic development. In view of the climatic issues. their consequences on the economy and diplomacy, these arbitrations are a real contradiction in terms.

It is unbearable to have to choose between two media caricatures that are the formulas of Sandrine Rousseau. the law of Senator Dupumb.

Anne-Cécile Suzanne

Integrating ecology into the market economy. that also means paying the farmer for the real price of products. If the environment is respected, then the price must reflect it. It is not just a consumer portfolio problem here. it is also a subject of millions spent on the protection of water tables, rivers, biodiversity, health. Pay at the source or pay the consequences as early as a thousand, the answer should be quickly found.

Pass response farmer sandrine rousseau advertising

Integrating ecology into the market economy, finally, is to stop making it a dogmatic subject. It is unbearable to have to choose between two media caricatures that are the formulas of Sandrine Rousseau. the law of Senator Dupumb. The enormous space between the two is a diversified agriculture. to the practices reflecting the realities of the territories, which makes its best in the midst of contradictory injunctions, natural constraints well present and a need to complete the ends of month in an implacable economic reality, which counts ecology as a charge.

We must see the world other than in the shock formula. the opposition, therefore, for the good of farmers and ecology, who today suffer together the inconsistencies about them and are in the same trait penalized … in particular by those who say they are defending them.