“We do not shout victory when you promise to cut your hand and leave you a finger”

The political episode that we live with the promulgation of the so -called Dupumb law on August 12, 2025 is exceptional in more than one title.

As usual. Similarly, the Macron government, the right and the extreme right defended the indefensible by advancing false arguments, claimed to be “science” when scientists said quite the opposite, and benefited from media and journalists stretching the microphone without contradiction. Consequently, A petition reaped more than 2.1 million signatures to oppose the Duplumb law. In addition, despite the contempt of the government and the conservative press which multiplied personal attacks on the opponents of this law.

Without a doubt, there was positive. Therefore, A historical enthusiasm. However, people with political sensitivities opposed together against the Duplumb law, a law which promotes industrial and dangerous farming for the health of French and French in more than one way.

But “we do not shout victory this positive remains to be transformed. Moreover, Because if we stick to the concrete, the sequence is very largely negative and screaming victory is anything but factual. For example, To put it more clearly: you are not shouting victory when you promise to cut your hand. Nevertheless, leave you a finger.

The Devil hides in the details – "we do not shout victory

A parallel between the promulgation of the DUPLomb law. Furthermore, the 2024 legislative elections could be done. Therefore, The left parties gathered within the NFP had then came to the lead and shouted Victoire.

It was certainly a political victory, unexpected by all the polls an “we do not shout victory unexpected score when the media presented a tidal wave of deputies national rally in the second round, with 200, sometimes 300 elected deputies. Therefore, The opportunity also to recall that gathering is the only solution to the danger that is the extreme right. But the reality is a little more to qualify. Not only did the extreme right made a historic score. and in addition to that, Emmanuel Macron ignored the results and chose François Bayrou as a minister, who governs hand in hand with the far right to avoid any risk of censorship.

Regarding the DUPLOM law, it is again dangerous, even false to scream victory. As the member of the High Council for the Climate Gonéré Le Cozannet said. the so -called Duplumb law “constitutes a serious and important decline for agriculture, health and the environment. For example, the article on water storage ignores research on adaptation“.

Here is mentioned “we do not shout victory only article 5 of the decision of the Constitutional Council, that relating, among other things, to the mega-bassines. The constitutionalist Thibaud Mulier had also alerted on the risks of this partial censorship by the Constitutional Council. of potentially dangerous consequences.

Let us take for example article 2. that which concerns the derogation of the prohibition of employment of certain phytosanitary products, in particular acetamipride. As the lawyer. specialist in environmental law specifies André Berne specifies:

“We read here where the Constitutional Council would have declared the unconstitutionality of this disposition improperly qualified as “reintroduction of neonicotinoids”. Now it is not the case since censorship does not relate to the derogation as such but due to the conditions of its implementation which are considered likely to compromise the right to live in a balanced. healthy environment (article 1 of the environment charter).

But do not worry. from its promulgation, there is “we do not shout victory no doubt that a DUPLOMM PPPUM 2 will be deposited, reintroducing the NNI derogation with the ad hoc conditions to make it conform, while others will write a full -text PPL of the text!

And indeed. it did not take 24 hours for Laurent Dupomb to know that he did not exclude a new text to reintroduce the acetamipride “. Did you say Victoire?

Another point that deserves attention. the reaction of Arnaud Rousseau, president of the FNSEA and directly concerned by the DUPLomb law via his activities in the April group:

If a person like Arnaud Rousseau is not howling to wolves and threatening to block the country or “we do not shout victory groups of people directly as he systematically has done since he is at the head of the FNSEA, it is because there is something to worry about.

The risk of seeing acetamipride come back is real. only a just political decision will be able to prevent it. The spokesperson for the Confédération Paysanne Thomas Gibert proposes for example the establishment of a safeguard clause to prohibit. the importation of products treated with acetamipride. “” “The peasant confederation had already obtained the use of this regulation tool in 2016 during the prohibition of dimethoate. it is therefore a claimable claim that we should all and all push“.

&quot. we do not shout victory

Everything remains to be done

The decision of the Constitutional Council is a small victory, on a reduced perimeter, at best. It is one more defeat for the ecology and the health of the French … for the moment. With more “we do not shout victory than 2 million people against the Duplumb law. mobilization shows that ecology “is not dead” in France and despite what some try to make us believe all year round, the French want more ecology.

The end of the story “DUPLOMB” still remains to be written. with uncertainties, but also certainties: no significant improvement in what is on our plates will arrive without changing the current system, an agro-industrial system bad for the environment, the majority of farmers and peasants, animals and the health of the French. No profound change will happen as long as power is in the hands of political parties mock the health. of the French.

To “we do not shout victory scream victory, you have to win. The success of the petition against the Dupumb law will only be a victory if the citizen enthusiasm of the summer materializes at the start of the school year in September 2025. that the French sanction in the polls or the street those who seek to poison them.