But at the time, it was expected that the Belgian authorities were going to improve the capacity. “”Information available, it appears that the promised improvements have not taken place and that there is no prospect of expanding the capacity“Note”Council of State” Wednesday. “The lack of reception places for isolated male asylum seekers is no longer temporary, but has become structural. And it is not clear if this group of asylum seekers can count on emergency reception or for homeless“. In addition, notes the Dutch body, these men have”not access to effective legal protection because the Belgian authorities do not respect judgments and do not pay the on -call ones“. In its communication, the Dutch Council of State speaks of”indifference“Belgian authorities. A word that immediately made the minister in charge of asylum and migration, the N-VA Anneleen Van Bossuyt tested. This reacted on Wednesday, rejecting any idea of”indifference“And ensuring that there had been above all”a structural overload (from the reception network of asylum seekers, editor’s note), for years“. “I inherited an asylum crisis“, she says. In recent years, Belgium has indeed allowed a situation to settle in which only asylum seekers considered to be the most fragile, women, families and minors who are not supported, are directly taken care of. Men alone have in principle right to be housed and fed, while their request for protection is processed, but in fact they are placed, if they wish, on lack of places in the Network. Fedasil.