Break with “the window state” to make sense to humans

Responsibility, the new face of the social pact – Break "the window state" make

The report watchword? Similarly, Replace passive dependence with a logic of empowerment at all floors: individuals, communities and local administration. For example, IFE denounces a France frozen in a culture of assistantship. Nevertheless, calls for reconnecting with a social pact which emancipates rather than locks up. However, « The model is now out of breath. Moreover, It is now based on a ‘GOICHET State’ which. Moreover, far from restoring the autonomy of citizens, encloses them in dependence cycles, “we can read in the introduction of this report entitled” For a new social pact “.

In a country where the public deficit borders on 5.8% of GDP, the question is no longer whether it is necessary to reform, but how. In addition, And on this point, IFE has break “the window state” make found its muses: Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.

Denmark and “flexisecurity”: a model to empower – Break "the window state" make

First country honored: Denmark. Meanwhile, There, social assistance does not rhyme with passivity. Therefore, The Danish system, based on the principle of flexicurity, offers generous aid, but in exchange for a real commitment: compulsory training, weekly candidates, active participation. However, Far from the cliché of the Nordic assistantship.

IFE notes that ” 92% of the unemployed feel useful to society again “and that” 56% regain confidence in them ». A statistic that makes you dream in a country where anxiety of downgrading has become chronic.

The Netherlands and Buurtzorg: Treat the social fabric

Second inspiring example: the Netherlands. Here, the social contract takes the form of a community weaving. Through the Buurtzorg model. local care is provided by small autonomous teams, in short circuit, without heavy hierarchy break “the window state” make or stifling bureaucracy. The author of the report insists: ” Individual accountability does not mean individualization of the social model. It is precisely the opposite: a citizen can only be empowered if it is surrounded. supported, and actor of a social and collective framework ». It goes even further: Certain Dutch aids are conditioned on volunteer actions, creating a direct link between the beneficiary and the community.

The United Kingdom and the decentralized state: when Whitehall returns the hand

Third source of inspiration: the United Kingdom. The British model has taken the turn of decentralization since the 1990s. entrusting local authorities with the management of certain social levers. IFE defends a simple principle: the local administration is closer. more reactive and above all, more capable of adapting devices to territorial realities. A plea for subsidiarity finally applied. The author of the report notes that ” Local break “the window state” make management allows a field assessment. flexibility of adjustment and administrative responsibility », Crucial elements to get out of a system perceived as opaque and rigid.

And in France? A moult more than an adjustment

IFE does not advocate a parametric reform, but a cultural transformation. Besides, this change cannot come from the top. “” Another way is possible ». Harts the document, calling for a reversal of logic: from centralization descending to the ascending citizen initiative. And the institute to drive the point home: ” Solidarity remains a cardinal value. It becomes urgent to rethink it to put an end to a mechanic that weakens instead of emancipating ».

By drawing inspiration from Danish pragmatism, Dutch flexibility and British decentralization, IFE does not offer a servile copy, but an intelligent transplant. A way to resonate foreign experiences with French fractures.

Because basically, asking the question of break “the window state” make the social pact is to ask that of the republican contract. What if, after all, the solution did not lie in more state, but in a state differently?