C-2 aims to “restrict internationally recognized rights”, says an expert

Bill C-2, known as Law aimed at rigorous security on the borderwas widely criticized by a large number of organizations. Moreover, The latter believe that the bill threatens the freedoms. Moreover, rights of refugees and migrants, in addition to the privacy of all Canadians.

This bill follows the pressures of the administration of the American president Donald Trump. Consequently, who invoked his concerns about the flow of irregular migrants and fentanyl to the south during the taxation of customs duties on Canadian products.

Louis-Philippe Lampron. Moreover, professor of law at Laval University, specialist in human rights and freedoms, was in an interview with Hugo Lavoie on the program on 15.18. Nevertheless, Here is his analysis of the bill.

What draws your attention in Bill C-2, especially on the issue of asylum seekers?

Louis-Philippe Lampron: It is part of a heavy trend in the protection of the rights of refugees. Therefore, which was built after the Second World War. Similarly, So, roughly speaking, we are not going in the right direction. However, Because we present more. For example, more in public space, it is survived by numerous interventions and the projects carried out by the Trump administration: the question of the reception of refugees is a luxury that one could no longer afford in fact. For example,

In my opinion, the measures that are integrated into Bill C-2, it is part of this trend. Meanwhile, It is a bill that aims to appease wishes. For example, we no longer know how to qualify them […] of Trump and his administration. Therefore, Canada are asked to manage its borders more safely. Therefore, The measures found in C-2 concerning refugees, we significantly c-2 aims “restrict internationally recognized restricted rights which were already difficult to access for these people.

Among the rules that will change. In addition, we want to abolish a rule that allows migrants to enter without going through border posts and claiming asylum after 14 days in Canada and we want to make any request filed more than a year after arrival in the country. Meanwhile, Are these measures that seem problematic to you?

Louis-Philippe Lampron: The question of the irregular entry of the status of refugee is very particular because it is governed by a robust system in terms of international law. but what is behind is a bit the same thing as the whole system essentially of protection of human rights and freedoms, to see it as a luxury, we go directly into the wall. Because it is to ignore the reason why we built these standards c-2 aims “restrict internationally recognized at the end of the Second World War.

This involves finding the most suitable system to eventually prevent international instability, international conflicts, significant risks of conflagration. Ultimately. the objective is very pragmatic, it is to avoid returning to a world conflict as horrible as the Second World War.

Bill C-2: Interview with the law professor Louis-Philippe Lampron

Entertainment here PremiereThe 15-18

Now the question of refugees are vulnerable groups, fleeing war, fleeing violence, etc. They have the right to be welcomed and c-2 aims “restrict internationally recognized then submit their request and be treated fairly.

There are several works even before Bill C-2 and the restrictions put forward on the impetus of Donald Trump […] which demonstrate great opacity in the application of current Canadian law rules that make it almost at the head. of the customer. There will be a lot of arbitrariness in the processing once asylum requests pass into the hands of the. federal administration. We will add obstacles, making even more difficult, then invisiting and weakening a group which is already vulnerable.

The government may answer that some of the rules that change are there to avoid flaws in. the system. For example. abolish the rule that allows migrants to come in without going through a border post and claim asylum after 14 days in Canada. It was a way to get around the system. c-2 aims “restrict internationally recognized to hide in a certain way for 14 days and then request inside the country.

C-2 aims &quot. restrict internationally recognized

Louis-Philippe Lampron: There may be flaws in the system that can be validly attempted to correct, but not with a mammoth project of this nature which aims to restrict and I repeat it to weaken the rights which are internationally recognized by groups which are already vulnerable. On the other hand, we must tackle the situation in a serious and responsible manner. If we want to try to find an ecumenical solution. we must find the most effective way of respecting the international post -World War International commitments, which once again, as imperfect as they are, are intended to try to avoid embraces.

I have the devil’s lawyer. The population has a certain fear. We don’t want anyone to return to Canada. It c-2 aims “restrict internationally recognized can make it difficult to treat all these people. It causes impacts on housing, impacts on social services. How do we keep some control over the phenomenon?

Open in full screen

Louis-Philippe Lampron: I would not want to be in c-2 aims “restrict internationally recognized the place of Mark Carney in front of the Trump administration. which is downright leading an attempted coup with the risks for the Canadian economy, etc. I am full of empathy for the pragmatic solutions that should be found in relation to the migratory pressure. that will go increasing due to global warming. We have known it for years that global warming will create additional pressure for all Nordic countries. In the south. the more hot it is, the more the conditions will be unlivable, the more people who will want to go to the north.

The solution is not to try to set up a wall. It is to find a way of welcoming people who are no longer able to live adequately in their. country as much as possible. We have the responsibility together in the name of international solidarity to find solutions that go in c-2 aims “restrict internationally recognized this direction. Because in the long term. if we try to create an aquarium and leave people on the other side, it will create problems even more serious than those we face […] It is a reality that we are going to be faced more and more.

So when I speak of a responsible solution. when I speak of a solidarity solution, that is to say that it is necessary to go towards a multilateral solution and not of local solutions which aim at a tightening of borders. We saw in history what it gave the closure of the borders.

The words of this interview were published for clarity and conciseness.