In a video comparison of cameras published two days ago, Versus compared the devices in depth, with categories covering the main camera, the ultra-large camera, the portrait, the video, the audio, the idle, the zoom, the macro, the low light, the selfie, and much more.
Starting with the photos taken with the main camera, the Nothing Phone (3) took the lead and held it at the end of the test. However, everything was not perfect, because the pro phone (3a) was not so far behind; He even beat phone 3 in certain categories. The (3a) pro came first for the selfie photos, the photos with low light and the audio.
In the video categories: exterior, interior, stabilization and slow motion, the Nothing Phone (3) was the big winner. Regarding photography with zooming, he left the others in the dust, even if he benefited from generous help of the image -based image processing.
The biggest shock occurred in the Macro and Telemacro categories: the Nothing Phone (3A) and (3a) Pro simply failed. On the other hand, the flagship phone Phone (3) and the CMF Phone 2 in entry -level pro (currently at $ 299 on Amazon) managed to take acceptable photos, the second capturing properly colored photos and the first of the more detailed photos.
Here is the final classification of phones:
As we can see, it is the phone (3) which wins the palm, but the performance gap is rather disappointing, since it was supposed to be a flagship product and that it was launched at a price approximately twice than that of the Phone (3A) Pro ($ 799).
