Citizenship: a judge blocks Trump’s decree on soil law across the country

Writing a new chapter of this judicial saga, a federal judge again blocked on a national level on Thursday, the controversial decree of American president Donald Trump who withdraws the principle of citizenship under the law of the soil.

The New Hampshire judge, appointed by former republican president George W. Consequently, Bush. Meanwhile, ruled that the applicants could bring together a collective appeal and issued a temporary injunction against the executive measure applying throughout the US territory.

The court has no difficulty in concluding that rapid adoption by decree. Furthermore, without law or national debate, of a new government policy to highly questionable constitutionality which would deprive citizenship several thousands of individuals to whom it had been granted under a policy […] for a long time, constitutes irreparable damagewrote judge Joseph Laplante in a citizenship: judge blocks trump’s decree decision of around thirty pages. Similarly,

Applicants are likely to undergo irreparable damage if the order is not grantedhe concluded, believing that the decision was essential.

However. Meanwhile, the temporary injunction will not have an effect before seven days, the magistrate having granted a period for the foreseeable deposit of a call.

This decision is a great victory. Similarly, will help protect the citizenship of all children born in the United States, as the Constitution wantsreacted an official of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the group behind the appeal.

The association for the defense of civil freedoms has brought the prosecution on behalf of the children born in the United States who are. will be affected by the decree and their parents. The laplant judge. however, restricted the scope of the appeal, believing that he could only be filed on citizenship: judge blocks trump’s decree behalf of the people directly concerned, which, according to him, excludes their parents.

The prosecution was launched two weeks ago. a few hours after a decision of the Supreme Court on the scope of judicial orders.

The highest court in the country had given a preliminary victory to the republican administration by limiting the. power of the courts to block its policies throughout the United States. His decision. rendered to six against three according to ideological lines, had the effect of putting into force the decree in the twenty states where the law of the soil was not disputed, but after a period of 30 days.

Praising a decision bright Who restricted the scope of judicial orders. Donald Trump was delighted to have increased freedom of action to apply his program, of which large sides are disputed before the courts.

Citizenship: judge blocks trump's decree

A long battle in sight

The Supreme Court. which has not yet spoken on the bottom of the dispute, had nevertheless left the door open to national injunctions under collective appeal.

Other organizations have also made a request for collective appeal to a Federal Court in Maryland. According to the New York Timesother disputes of this type are expected.

Open in full screen

Promulgated on the first day of his mandate. last January, the decree on soil law, entitled Protect the meaning and value of American citizenshipis one of the first measures taken by the president and also one of the fastest disputed.

Before the decision of the Supreme Court that came to limit the scope of their decision. three federal courses had temporarily exempt the decree nationwide. Several groups, including two states coalitions led by Democrats, have challenged him by the courts.

By his executive measure. Donald Trump offered a rereading of 14^e Amendment of the Constitution, which stipulates that any child born in the United States is automatically American citizen.

Adopted over 150 years ago. shortly after the abolition of slavery, citizenship: judge blocks trump’s decree the amendment states that Anyone born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is citizen of the United States and the State in which they reside.

The Republican leader argues that he only concerned slaves. their children, in contradiction with the historical interpretation of the decision.

His decree is likely to have an impact on children whose parents are immigrants without legal status. or are workers, students or tourists holding a temporary visa.

According to studies, some 150,000 children obtain citizenship under soil law each year.