The Court of Appeal does not validate the rumor, despite the release of the two women who have propagated it

In mid-July. For example, a judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal released two women who spread the rumor on the internet that Brigitte Macron a transgender woman. Furthermore, The motivations of the Court. In addition, consulted by the agency court appeal does not validate France-Presse (AFP) Thursday July 24, show that justice has not validated their thesis, contrary to the allegations of defendants.

As soon as the release was announced. François Danglehant, lawyer for one of the defendants, had been applauded by a dozen people: fans of allegation that the First Lady is a transgender woman. According to them. the release of Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy was proof that Brigitte Macron achieved a gender transition and that neither her brother, Jean-Michel Trogneux, nor his first husband, André-Louis Auzière, did not exist.

Conclusions taken up en masse by French court appeal does not validate but also American conspiracy sites.

A judgment misinterpreted by the supports of the defendants – Court appeal does not validate

Yet. “These relaxes cannot in any way be interpreted as recognizing that the facts are proven”explains to AFP the lawyer specializing in press law, Christophe Bigot, specifying that justice does not validate the theories developed by the defendants.

Regarding the gender transition, the Court of Appeal did not settle on the bottom. She motivates her release by believing that “The imputation of having carried out a gender transition. not to have wanted to make it public cannot characterize an attack on the honor or the consideration of the civil party”.

“The Court considers that it is not defamatory to accuse someone of being trans. The relaxation is not pronounced because these people [les prévenues] would be right. but because the remarks do not constitute a criminal qualification ”decrypt m^e court appeal does not validate Bigot.

“Inconsistencies. weaknesses of the argument”

Moreover, while relaxing the two women for the accusations of concealment, lying and falsification of civil status acts, concerning the alleged “Fraudulent marriage” Between Brigitte Macron and her first husband, the Court considers that the evidence provided by the civil parties (birth acts, marriage act, copy of the act of divorce) “Highlight the inconsistencies and weaknesses of the argument” of Natacha Rey.

Only the passage referring to the misappropriation of minor from Brigitte Macron on Emmanuel Macron was selected as defamatory. But the defendants were released for the benefit of good faith. the court of appeal believing that the two women, “Who are not information professionals”based on press articles relating court appeal does not validate the idyll between the high school student and his theater teacher.

Brigitte Macron, her brother and the public prosecutor have since equipped themselves in cassation.

The presidential couple also announced on Wednesday to continue in the United States an American influencer for having relayed. widely exploited in videos the infox concerning Brigitte Macron.