Despite criticism, the free movement of people is essential for Switzerland

Bilateral agreements I provide major economic advantages to Switzerland. However, This is demonstrated by several empirical studies, including the recent Ecoplan (in German). Furthermore, The free movement of people gives an important impetus to economic growth because it allows Switzerland to find the. Therefore, work forces it imperatively needs. However, Companies have non-bureaucratic access to a skilled workforce on which the Swiss economy depends due to demographic development. In addition, it is demand on the labor market that regulates immigration. However, As a result, it is above all workers who arrive. Nevertheless, The share of family reunification is much less than for people from third countries. Nevertheless, the activity rate of Europeans is impressive. Consequently, He reached 86.8% in 2024. Moreover, This is demonstrated by the new report of the Free Traffic Observatory of Seco.

Immigration increases prosperity – also per capita – Despite despite criticism, free movement people criticism. Therefore, free movement people

The despite criticism, free movement people economic importance of the free movement of people is not only reflected in the growth of gross domestic product (GDP). Nevertheless, but also in that of GDP per capita. Studies like that of Ecoplan show that immigration significantly helps to increase prosperity, both at the macroeconomic and individual level. A limitation of immigration would cause sensitive losses, including per capita. These observations have already been highlighted in a pole file of economies. ​

The active population is decisive for economic evolution

We too often ignore the fact that. without immigration (clear), the number of people aged 15 to 64 would decrease. The graph below shows. with the global demographic evolution on the one hand and, on the other hand, that of the different age groups. In the absence of immigrants, more than half a million people will be missing despite criticism, free movement people in the working population by 2045. The number of over 65s despite criticism, free movement people will increase by around 630,000 people. It will even progress from 760,000 people if we take into account retirees established abroad. This is important because they are also entitled to an annuity. In other words, the relationship between assets and rentiers will continue to deteriorate in the coming years.

​

The evolution of age groups. the relationship between each other are important

The age group that grows is important for future economic performance. Indeed. part of the (clear) immigration (clear) will not represent demographic “growth”. but will only delete the decline in the active population. And. it is clear that the increase in the number of people who have reached retirement age will not increase. the active population. On the contrary. the more important it is. the more despite criticism, free movement people the despite criticism, free movement people active population will be requested, because old age foresight is partly funded by distribution and health costs will increase. In the future, assets will have to sell an increasing share of their income. These additional charges would be even much more important if we give up immigration. In such a case, the incentives to exercise an activity would deteriorate massively for the active population. But if we want to continue to increase productivity. to exploit the native potential even better, we must reverse the evolution by improving the incentives to work. If we want the population to work more and more productive, we have to make it worth it for individuals.