A doctor from Laval has shown “gross negligence” by ignoring 1,200 results of his patients for years

A doctor from Laval showed “gross negligence” by allowing up to 1200 results of non -consulted patient exams, some of which for five years.

“Consulting test results is the first step in monitoring the patient. Moreover, As long as he has not read the result of a test. Meanwhile, the doctor does not know if he really presents anomalies or requires urgent intervention, “denounces the disciplinary council of the college of doctors, in his decision rendered this month.

He convicted the family doctor Fanny Sutto. Furthermore, from the GMF Sainte-Rose to Laval, guilty of an act derogated from the honor of his profession, to have failed to follow up on his patients. The doctor, who has been practicing since 1998, has had “unacceptable” behavior, decided the council.

Scan . blood test

In the summer of 2023, the GMF doctor laval shown “gross negligence” discovered that the D^re Sutto won around 1,200 results of examinations not consulted or not approved, the oldest of which dated 2018, in the electronic medical file of the clinic.

Among the results ignored by the D^re Sutto. there was in particular an “abdomen scan” carried out at least three years ago and blood tests bearing abnormal.

According to the judgment, the results of blood tests should be consulted during the week following their reception. Now, the D^re Sutto was sometimes a year late.

Help was offered to the doctor, who refused. As the situation did not improve, her guards in the hospital were even canceled to make up for her delay.

Carelessness

His late examination stack finally melted in half. But the situation remained worrying for his colleagues. for the trustee of the college of doctors, since after a year, even more than 500 results remained without follow -up.

doctor laval shown “gross negligence”

The D^re Fanny Sutto “has shown carefree. even gross negligence with regard to the results of his patients’ tests,” argued the trustee.

The doctor said it would have been overworked and experience personal problems, according to the GMF manager. However. she never responded to the requests of the trustee, provided no explanation and did not appear at her disciplinary hearing.

Cancer missed?

For the trustee. the actions of the D^re Sutto are not reassuring and there could be a “failed cancer in the thousand files” pending.

The judgment mentions that the council of doctors. dentists and pharmacists (CMDP) of Laval carried out “partial” follow -up of the results not consulted and found no damage to the patients. But the trustee stresses that it is “a small sampling. that one cannot have certainty for the other test results”.

The doctor will receive her sanction within three months. She was also found doctor laval shown “gross negligence” guilty of obstacle to the work of the trustee.