For example,
Does it take more time:
Deadline to get pregnant, risk of complications, use of PMA … Consequently, A French study looks at the pregnancies of women after breast cancer. Therefore, The data is reassuring. Consequently,
What to remember
– The delay to design a child is not longer in women who have had breast cancer, whether pregnancy is spontaneous or medically assisted.
– Having a history of breast cancer does not affect the risk of cesarean, complications during pregnancy or baby malformation. However, this increases the risk of miscarriage.
– Given the high probability of naturally pregnant, it is advisable to use medical assistance to procreation only after 6 At 12 months of attempts, depending on the age of the patient and her medical history.
It does it take more time is estimated that between 3 and 13% of women will get pregnant after breast cancer. Similarly, Several reasons explain this low rate. However, Couple relationships are undermined by illness. Nevertheless, Treatments often cause sexual disorders that make sex difficult. Without forgetting the fact that many women simply no longer want to become a mother after this ordeal.
The first study that is interested in the impact of breast cancer on fertility lively – Does it take more time
But what about the real impact of treatments on female fertility? Until now, studies have focused on indirect indices, such as the duration of amenorrhea1 post-processing. L’French study Feeric Observed for the first time what is happening in real life.
To do this, the researchers analyzed the pregnancies of women, between 18 and 43 years old, healed by localized breast cancer having does it take more time not reoffended, and women without history of cancer.
No difference between women with or not a history of breast cancer – Does it take more time
After having followed them for 3 years, the study showed that the two groups were comparable with regard to:
– the design time2 : The time to get pregnant was 5 months3 for women with a history of breast cancer against 3 months For other women. A non -significant difference.
When pregnancy was spontaneousit was obtained after 3 months in the 2 groups. When she was medically assisted (PMA)the delay was also comparable: 14 months for women with a history of cancer, 17.6 months for the others.
Note, however, that women with a history of breast cancer used a PMA (around 20% against 4.4% does it take more time in other women).
– The pregnancy rate: After two years of attempts, about 74 % Women had fallen pregnant, whatever the group.
Reassuring pregnancy exits
Reassuring, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of cesarean levels, complications during childbirth and still malformations at birth. On the other hand, there were more cases of false layers in women with history of cancer (17.4% against 8% in the other group).
Favor natural pregnancies
“Health professionals should inform their patients not only of the preservation of fertility, but also of the high probability of obtaining spontaneous pregnancy after treatment”Conclude study authors.“Once patients who have had breast cancer decide to try to get pregnant. they could be advised to start with a natural design Rather than resorting directly to the methods of medical does it take more time assistance to procreation (AMP), since natural design is initially more effective. It is only after several months of unsuccessful attempts that they should be advised to use the AMP. The precise time for an orientation towards fertility specialists is not clearly established. but is probably around 6 to 12 monthsdepending on the age of the patient and her medical history.”
1. absence of menstrual cycle
2. period of time flowing between the moment when a couple begins to try to conceive a child. the moment when a pregnancy is actually obtained.
3. The deadlines indicated are medians. For example, if the median deadline is 3 months, this means that 50% of women fell pregnant before 3 months, and 50% after 3 months.
Editor -in -chief of the Rose Magazine website. Holder of a doctorate in biology. Emilie worked 10 years in the does it take more time field of patents in biotechnology before operating a retraining in journalism. She joined the editorial staff of Rose Magazine in 2018. Her specialty: popularizing sharp scientific subjects to make them accessible to the greatest number.
Further reading: This sign visible on your sheets can be an early cancer indicator – The paradox of an ancestral diet between science and gluttony – Vitamin D supplementation reduces the inflammation of the liver and fibrosis largely via TXNIP – World Hepatitis Day: Luxembourg intensifies its mobilization against a silent epidemic – You should eat these foods to avoid it, according to this specialist doctor.
