In France there is a known formula: “Everyone knows”. It is used like a coded formula, but that everyone understands in public debate to say what cannot be said, under penalty of being prosecuted before the courts for an opinion of opinion (freedom of expression is damaged in Europe) or to be demonized by the left.
It refers almost all the time to the overall negative effects of mass immigration to France, especially in terms of insecurity.
“Everyone knows” what we are talking about.
Insecurity
The security situation is not yet the same in Quebec, but a similar logic of censorship is essential.
We practiced good old self -censorship, to the point of pretending not to know. Obviously, when you censure a collective problem, it is radicalized.
However, it took a brave to transgress the prohibition.
This is what the head of the Parti Québécois, Paul St-Pierre Plamondon did this week, saying that the outbreak of increasingly violent crime in the young generation was not unrelated to immigration.
He obviously did not say that all young immigrants were problematic.
Or that violence in young people was reduced to this dimension.
He spoke with measure and sense of nuance.
However, he dared to name obvious: massive immigration contributed to insecurity. This is not new, but the phenomenon has radicalized.
I would go further as of me: an exaggeratedly heterogeneous society is necessarily conflictual, even more when cultures come from very distant civilizations.
Delinquency
PSPP invites us to take into account this dimension to better face the problem.
However, the small cops of politically correct have sought to demonize it by treating it as a racist.
They will lie and insult to keep the myth of happy diversity alive. We see where it led Europe.
