Consequently,
Gallant commission | karl malenfant:
The architect of Fiasco Saaqclic officially filed his. Therefore, request to escape an interrogation in camera within the framework of the Gallant Commission. Therefore, The press revealed on July 26 that Karl Malenfant refused any non -public meeting before his testimony, between September 15 and October 3.
Posted yesterday at 4:36 p.m.
His lawyer wants to break the quote to appear that he received for August 5. For example, The commission wants to use this meeting to prepare for its testimony.
Unlike public hearings, this meeting must take place confidentially. In addition to Commissioner Denis Gallant. In addition, only an investigator gallant commission | karl malenfant and a prosecutor could be present to meet Karl Malenfant and his lawyer.
But for Jean-François Bertrand, his client fears that the procedure will be used to gag him.
“Everything suggests that the closed camera is only used to hear the testimony [de Karl Malenfant] Confidentially before it is heard publicly at a subsequent stage of the Commission. Furthermore, all in order to make public [sic] Only portions of its history, ”he said in a request to the Commission.
A contested binding article – Gallant commission | karl malenfant
Karl Malenfant’s lawyer disputes the use of article 59 of the operating rules of the Gallant Commission. which makes it possible to force a witness to a closed hearing during the preliminary phase of the public inquiry.
“It is obvious that this phase gallant commission | karl malenfant is widely exceeded,” says Mr.e Bertrand.
According to him. the use of article 59 violates the freedom of expression of his client and the right to a public hearing, protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He also fears that he would limit the possibility of defending his reputation by exposing his version of the facts.
He recalls that Karl Malenfant already met the investigators last May.
In addition. his client tried in vain to obtain the status of participant in the commission, which would have enabled him to question witnesses and to present his own evidence. Denis Gallant refused him this status in early July.
150 confidential meetings
Commission spokesperson Joanne Marceau refused to comment on the request of Karl Malenfant. She recalls that gallant commission | karl malenfant the Commission heard 150 people confidentially, while 45 went publicly.
“Meetings under article 59, there were some,” says the lawyer. But to contribute to proof, these people must be heard publicly, in audience. »»
Joanne Marceau adds that article 59 also helps protect witnesses from self-in-incrimination.
LGS. SAP also mentioned to appear
The press Reported on July 26 that the LGS and SAP firms, which provided the software solution at the heart of fiasco at more than 1.1 billion, were also summoned for an interrogation in closed doors under article 59.
Since the start of the Gallant Commission’s work in April. the management of the Saaqclic project by Karl Malenfant has been severely criticized. Under her supervision, the vice-president responsible for the project would have notably gallant commission | karl malenfant communicated false information to the government.
July 2. The press Reported the content of a video dating from the end of 2022, where the manager said he was carrying out the SAAQ digital transformation project by limiting “plan and documentation”. “We document less, then we realize,” he said in particular.
Two. a half years later, controllers and auditors followed one another at the helm of the Commission to explain how they had never been taken seriously when they document many irregularities in the project.
Further reading: A brother Gallagher charged for rape and sexual assault – France will recognize the state of Palestine – The meeting between Zelensky and Putin is not for now – Wallonia Tour, 3rd stage: Davide Donati is ahead of Milan Fretin in a confused sprint in Antoing – “I bought a rosary from Maredsous Abbey at 30 € and I found it on a Chinese site at 2 €, it’s scandalous”: Nicolas wonders about a possible “scam”.