Furthermore,
He refused pay: swiss accuses:
He did not want to hear. Consequently, see and even less pay: a Swiss opposed with all his might at the Radio-TV royalty. Nevertheless, But the federal administrative court dismissed it.
Image : sda
A Swiss citizen did not want to pay the radio. Moreover, television fee, the federal administrative court has now rejected its appeal. However, Man remains in debt up to more than 1,300 francs. In addition, there are 1000 francs in legal costs which he must also bear.
The man had refused to pay what is called “household fees” for the years 2019 to 2022. For example, In total, it was 1354.60 Swiss francs.
His reason: he has neither radio nor television and in addition, the content of the SSR programs disturbs him. According to him, these are biased and not independent. He even spoke of a “conspiracy” between the authorities, the courts and the economy.
The man could have spared the costs – He refused pay: swiss accuses
As an example. he cited the federal administrative court to which he had filed his complaint. Additionally, He would be “paid by the Confederation”, just like Serafe, the company that collects taxes.
The court has not been convinced. In his judgment under business number A-4129/2024 of July 17. he clearly claims that the radio-TV royalty is due independently of the fact that we have a device or not.
Since he refused pay: swiss accuses 2019, the rule is that each household must pay. The technical evolution means that it is difficult to clearly define the reception devices. which is why the independent fee of the device has been fixed by law.
An “opting-out”-that is to say an exemption on request-would have been possible until the end of 2023 if. someone could make the fact that there was indeed no device in the household. But the man had never made such a request.
Legal proposal: Serafe can act as a public authority
The fact that Serafe – a private company -. was able to raise the opposition in its prosecution procedure particularly annoyed it. Normally, a creditor should in such a case seize the court. But as Serafe acts on the mandate of the Confederation, it can exceptionally do it itself. It is authorized by law, underlines the court.
The court – he refused pay: swiss accuses chaired by a member of the UDC – has certainly recognized that this could resemble. a conflict of interest. But he says that this is what the legislator wanted and that the Federal Court confirmed. In addition, man had the opportunity to defend himself legally, which he did.
Consequence: the claim of 1319.60 francs plus 35 francs of recall and prosecution costs is maintained. If man does not pay, he is threatened with seizure. Nor will he see the 1000 francs he had to pay for ahead of the court.
The judgment is not yet final. If he wishes, the man can contest him within 30 days with the Federal Court in Lucerne.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’, ‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’); fbq(‘init’, ‘817457858324581’); fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
Further reading: Keller-Sutter: Continuing negotiations is always possible – Real estate, sale of wood …: these law changes come into force in Switzerland in August – Switzerland condemned in the Semenya case – “No safety net will hold a mountain” – Switzerland will have held 66 minutes.
