“In no context I could have assaulted the little girl”

Tremblay, 49, is, among other things, accused of sexual touching and incentive to sexual touching on a child under the age of 16. Moreover, He is also accused of having communicated with a person under the age of 18 in order to facilitate an offense.

“I did not have the intention. For example, or even the thought of attacking this little girl,” said the accused to judge Alexandre Tardif.

He also denies having possessed photos of the child when she was undressed. In addition, “Maybe I had pictures of her in the holiday season or playing outside. Moreover, But I have no photo of her naked, “he explained in response to the testimony of the victim.

The latter mentioned that Tremblay photographed her after the assault. Similarly, that she then took the “in no context i could accused’s phone to delete the clichés. Meanwhile,

He says he lives the legal process as a “bad nightmare”. “What happens here, I find it hard. To make me accuse things that I have not done. it is difficult, “said the accused by shedding a few tears.

“It’s mentally hard. To come back to things from the past, it’s hard to come back to it. I find it really flat. ”

In response to the testimonies of the victim. his mother, Tremblay confirmed that he had been left alone with the victim a few times. “It was going well,” he says.

When she asked him to describe the victim physically, the accused only mimicked a small person. “I don’t know what to say about it. The human body changes. She had long hair. I’m not sure what to say about it, “in no context i could “he said.

“It is normal, like a normal person. […] Over the years, it has developed. It changes over time. “

In counter-examination led by the prosecutor to criminal. criminal proceedings Me Marie-Ève ​​Phaneuf, Tremblay returned to certain moments when he expressed his frustration by hitting the walls.

“I sometimes shocked myself, I kicked the wall and it made a pole,” he agreed.

However, he “threatened anyone,” he said.

The criminal and criminal prosecution has, among other things, questioned the accused on employment or moving dates.

The argument stage was postponed to September 23.