Consequently,
Market leaders caught up their:
Between marketing and science, the sun puts anti-UV creams to the test. Moreover, But should we still believe everything we read on the tubes?
The Magazine 60 million consumers Published an explosive survey: eight of the most sold sunscreen references have. In addition, been subjected to rigorous tests. Therefore, Objective displayed: measure their real efficiency against UVB and UVA rays, their environmental safety and their quality of use. Furthermore, And the results, far from the displayed promises, give serious sunburn to certain brands.
Sunscreen: a more fragile UV shield than announced – Market leaders caught up their
The test carried out by 60 million consumers (1) reveals an. For example, icing paradox: almost all products displaying a SPF 50+ do not always keep their market leaders caught up their commitments. Similarly, Certainly. Therefore, ” All tested solar products comply with a recommended minimum condition: 90 % of the UV rays absorbed by creams are less than 370 nanometers», Can we read in the article 60 million consumer s. Moreover, But only a few really exceed a SPF 60, a threshold yet required to claim the famous “50+”.
As for protection against UVA, the results are downright disappointing. Similarly, 60 million consumerspoints out that only three products exceed a UVA-PF index of 20. Meanwhile, that is to say a third of the SPF-threshold deemed necessary by European standards for minimum efficiency. Moreover, A spray claiming a PA ++++ (Japanese notation) ” indicates a UVA-PF greater than 16-which it does not reach », Underlines the test. This performance is all the more worrying since UVA represent 95 % of UV radiation. are strongly involved in skin cancers, according to the World market leaders caught up their Health Organization (WHO).
The case of Avène sunscreen, formulated only with titanium dioxide, is emblematic. If it is positively surprised by its anti-UVB efficiency, it is deemed mediocre on the UVA. In question: a different test method used by the magazine. HDRS (hybrid diffuses spectroscopy reflectance), while the manufacturer ensures that its product “presents effective protection in UVA with a recognized and validated method: UVA in vivo ISO 24442”.
Expired sunscreen? Do not take a risk!
Sunscreen. environment: formulas far from clean
Sun cream does not protect the skin: it is also supposed to respect the planet. At least on paper. In reality. the results of the Cosmeto’Score, which assess the impact of health and environment ingredients, reveal a mediocre note for the majority of the products tested. A single product – that of dew – escapes this criticism.
Avène cream, for example, transparently displays the use of an extremely market leaders caught up their worrying substance (SVHC) for the environment. Other products. such as those of Garnier or Mixa, are noted “e” for their aquatic impact, despite an environmental score “A” self-assigned by L’Oréal. This internal notation, skillfully presented, encompasses the recyclability of the packaging, the social dimension … but not only the ecotoxicity of the ingredients.
Titanium dioxide, especially in nanometric form, also raises questions. Even if it is authorized, this mineral filter is not without scientific ambiguity. A study published by the EWG (Environmental Working Group) in 2021 revealed that many tested solar creams offered real UVA protection much lower than the claimed SPF. which fuels doubts on current formulations.
Special file: everything on sunscreen
Sunscreen. comfort: when the market leaders caught up their texture betrays the promise
But beyond the figures, the sunscreen must also convince by its texture, its smell, its ease of application. In this field, the products tested show very variable performance. “”The SVR cream appeared to us a little sticky, like the La Roche-Posay fluid », note60 million consumers . Conversely, Garnier, Mixa and Nivea are deemed pleasant to spread, but decked out of a “Same unclear plastic smell». White traces. often pointed out by users, are more marked with mineral filters – as at Avène, followed by Bioderma and Garnier. The test nevertheless underlines that this particularity can be perceived positively, because it “Allows you to view the covered parts ».
Finally, the general recommendations of manufacturers remain unclear. “”The majority of brands are content to advise to apply their product‘generously’. in a uniform or homogeneous manner, by renewing it‘frequently’ ”, deplores the article. An QR Explanatory Code on the market leaders caught up their right dosage would however be useful for combating the subdosing. a major loss of efficiency factor.
Read
Alert: worrying substances in children’s solar products
Subscribe to Consoglobe on Google News not to miss any info!
(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v3.0”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));(function(d, s, id) market leaders caught up their { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/fr_FR/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.9&appId=1475691812691351”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, “script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
Further reading: Solar creams, anti-UV clothing, glasses … how to protect yourself effectively – The 4 worst chick -free teas according to 60 million consumers – Millions of lives in danger | The vaccination of children weakened in the world, warns a study – My discovery of this ruby fruit that boosts good cholesterol naturally – This fast visual test reveals your acuity.
