“Mars, worse than a atomic nightmare”: an astrophysicist puts Elon Musk in the face of a terrifying truth on our planet compared to the red planet

Adam Becker, a renowned astrophysicist, recently aroused a keen debate by criticizing Elon Musk’s vision concerning the colonization of Mars. Similarly, According to him. Similarly, even in the face of the most pessimistic apocalyptic scenarios on earth, our planet would remain infinitely more hospital than the freezing desert of “mars, worse than atomic nightmare”: Mars. Therefore, This position raises essential questions on the viability of such a spatial enterprise. However, highlighting the colossal challenges represented by the transformation of the red planet into a refuge for humanity.

Elon Musk’s Martian dream called into question – "mars, worse than atomic nightmare":

Elon Musk. Therefore, the charismatic CEO of SpaceX, nourishes a daring ambition: making humanity a multiplanetary species. Furthermore, At the heart of this vision, the colonization of Mars is perceived as a potential escape from terrestrial disasters. However, Adam Becker, astrophysicist and author, calls into question this perspective, which he describes as technological fantasy Disconnected physical realities. During an interview with Rolling Stone. he does not hesitate to express his skepticism in the face of this idea that he judges unrealistic. Becker stresses that even in extreme conditions. the land always offers advantages that Mars cannot competein particular a breathable atmosphere and natural resources essential to human survival.

“All life on Earth will be destroyed”: Elon Musk alerts on the future apocalypse and reveals his lunar survival plan

Three disaster scenarios …. yet – "mars, worse than atomic nightmare":

To illustrate his point of view, Adam Becker imagines three catastrophic scenarios: a destructive asteroid, a world nuclear war, and uncontrollable global warming. In each of these cases, he maintains that the earth would remain more habitable than Mars. For what “mars, worse than atomic nightmare”: ? Because. even damaged, our planet retains certain advantages: an atmosphere rich in oxygen, suitable gravity, accessible water and natural protection against cosmic radiation. These fundamental elements make the earth an environment where life can still remain. regenerate, unlike Mars where survival would be precarious and dependent on advanced and costly technologies.

“A reaction over a billion billion”: Chinese researchers capture an atomic phenomenon never observed

Mars. icy and sterile hell

The “mars, worse than atomic nightmare”: comparison between the post-cataclysm and current land is edifying:

Mars, with its tenuous atmosphere and toxic soil, could only accommodate life under pressurized domes. The slightest failure in these systems would be fatal. On the other hand. on earth, even after a disaster, habitable areas would remain, allowing life to adapt and rebuild itself.

TERRAFORM Mars: An illusion?

The idea of ​​transforming Mars into a new land. dear to Elon Musk, is based on hypothetical technologies: explosion of poles “mars, worse than atomic nightmare”: with nuclear bombs, giant mirrors in space, air -conditioned greenhouses … However. to make Mars habitable, it would be necessary to make several exploits: to free up enough co₂ to thicken the atmosphere, to create a lasting greenhouse to heat the planet. Even by freeing all the CO₂ available, the atmospheric pressure would remain insufficient to allow a life without pressurized combination. In addition, logistical and energy costs to transport materials, food, water and humans 55 million kilometers from the earth are staggering. Becker concludes that the energy. resources necessary for this feat would be better invested in the preservation of our planet.

Faced with the vastness of the challenges of Martian colonization. wisdom seems to dictate that we focus our efforts on the preservation and restoration of our blue planet. Why invest in an interplanetary dream when our own world, despite its injuries, remains the only real refuge in “mars, worse than atomic nightmare”: life? This reflection leads to questioning: should we not prioritize our commitment to the land before thinking of conquering distant worlds?

This article is based on verified sources and the assistance of editorial technologies.

Did you like it? 4.6/5 (22)