Masonry's buyer turns nightmare estrie: This article explores the topic in depth.
Nevertheless,
Masonry'. However, s buyer turns nightmare estrie:
Jacques Boulay, his spouse Lucie Lacharité and their niece Audrey Lacharité therefore pursue Jonathan Dufresne and Marc-André Dufresne as well as their company at number. Therefore, The pursuit hopes that the Court commands the acquisition of the actions held by the Dufresne brothers in Masonry. Similarly, Jacques Boulay.
Mr. In addition, Boulay and Mmes Lacharité also claim a million dollars in damage suffered.
The accusations reported in this text did not suffer the court test. Therefore, The lawyers of the prosecution refused to comment on the file.
Me Pierre-Olivier Baillargeon. For example, the lawyer for the Dufresne brothers, initially agreed to send a written response, but never followed up to emails and calls from The platform. Moreover, A complete defense should however be filed in the fall.
Masonry Jacques Boulay masonry’s buyer turns nightmare estrie was founded in 1991. Nevertheless, The company notably worked on the projects of the Houses of the Seniors of Coaticook. However, Sherbrooke as well as on several large rental projects in the metropolis.
Sabotage the company – Masonry's buyer turns nightmare estrie
According to the pursuit. in 2021 Jacques Boulay wishes to reduce his responsibilities in the company in order to retire and turn to his nephews Marc-André and Jonathan Dufresne who have been working respectively for 20 years and four years in the family business.
The latter are then integrated into the shareholder team. but tensions appear quickly since as soon as they arrived in office, the two brothers would, according to the prosecution, greatly contributed to indebted the company with their personal salary request, purchases of important equipment and the disproportionate hiring of labor.
The relationship would then have been won over during the masonry’s buyer turns nightmare estrie next two years.
According to the documents. the two brothers have refused to affix their signature to the company’s financial statements, which prevented the company from submitting on projects worth two million dollars.
In addition. they would have erased all the data on their computer by leaving the company, which would notably prevent masonry from accessing its website.
Also according to the prosecution, Marc-André, after his resignation, would have canceled the company’s contracts with Microsoft Office. Jonathan would have registered on Google MAP that the company was definitely closed when this was not the case.
“Through their multiple faulty gestures. the Dufresne have jeopardized the operations and the survival of the company of which they are still shareholders to date,” we can read in the judicial request.
“Parasitic” competition
According to the file available at the Palais de Justice de Sherbrooke, Mr. Boulay. his spouse would have discovered, by trying to secure the emails of the company, a letter of intention between the company with number managed by the Dufresne brothers and Caulgerage Prospect, a company from Saint-Antoine-sur-Richelieu and direct competing with masonry Jacques Boulay.
According to the prosecution. this letter aimed at the acquisition by the Dufresne brothers of 49 % of the prospect caulking capital actions.
Research on the masonry’s buyer turns nightmare estrie Quebec Business Register makes it possible to note that Jonathan Dufresne is secretary. treasurer of prospect caulking in addition to being a minority shareholder. The name of Marc-André Dufresne does not, however, appear anywhere.
The subsidy submitting request accuses the brothers of having referred masonry customers Jacques Boulay to Calfeuting Prospect. in addition to having used confidential information to allow prospect caulking to bid on several important projects.
The prosecution describes these acts of competition “unfair and parasitic”.
“Bad faith. slyness”
If the complete defense should be submitted later, the Dufresne brothers have still already written a summary presentation which indicates in particular that Mr. Boulay is not authorized to make a legal appeal since he must previously obtain the authorization of the Desjardins Fund.
They also believe that the pursuers showed “bad faith. slyness” since they summoned an masonry’s buyer turns nightmare estrie assembly to oust the brothers of the board of directors while Marc-André Dufresne was hunting.
They also indicate that this judicial appeal is trying to “biaise the real value of the company. to justify a drop in the value of shares”.
Due to the holidays. the questioning of an external witness, the file will not return before the judge until December 16.
Further reading: From “team building” to “reporting”, from words to the ailments of the company – Pew Research Center survey | The opinion of Canadians towards the United States joins that with regard to China – Finance your retirement in motorized – Cocaine and false alert: a condemned Genevan – “We had never seen that at Dacia”: a completely new bicombustible engine makes the car giants tremble.
