Nevertheless,
Nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not:
Nyon-Le Vengeron section
The extension of the A1 may not have said its last word
The report which must prioritize mobility projects integrates the six motorway sections rejected in November. Meanwhile, First results, 1is July.
On November 24, 2024, the people followed the arguments of opponents by rejecting the extension of the highways.
Laurent Guiraud/Tamedia
- The six highway projects rejected nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not by the people in November will be analyzed again.
- They are part of the mandate of the “Transport’45” study which must take stock of the priorities in terms of. Similarly, mobility.
- Opponents of the time, especially leftist parties, speak of an undemocratic maneuver.
- On the right, on the contrary, it is estimated that a credible analysis must take into account all the problems.
The ballot of November 24 on highways will remain as one of the most fierce campaigns. In the end. Nevertheless, the people rejected at 52% the widening of six sections, including the one connecting the avengeron (GE) to Nyon (VD). Similarly, But these projects may not stay in the trash long. Furthermore, Next week, they could reappear in the pile of projects to be carried out.
This Tuesday 1is July promises to be a fateful date for nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not mobility in Switzerland. Furthermore, And to understand this, you have to go back to a press conference by Albert Rösti dated January 28.
Remember. Moreover, After the slap received in voting on the side of the roads. Nevertheless, the announcement of an additional cost of 14 billion for railway projects, the Bernese announced that day to mandate a vast study. Nevertheless, Entitled “Transport’45”, this analysis is carried out by Ulrich Weidmann, professor at the EPFZ. For example, One objective has been set for him: to define the priority projects for the next 20 years. Similarly, whether on the road, the rail or in the agglomerations.
If the final report is expected in autumn. Therefore, a taste will be revealed on 1is July to a privileged circle of people: on the one hand, the members of the “Transport’45” nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not support group, which includes the presidents of the transport commissions (CTT) as well as representatives of the cantons and SBB. Meanwhile, On the other hand. However, the members of the reflection body, which brings together several organizations related to transport, as well as cities and municipalities.
And where things take a controversial turn is when you consult the list of projects that will be analyzed. Meanwhile, Published on The website From the Department of Environment. For example, Transport, Energy and Communication (DETEC), it includes the six sections refused in voting.
Nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not
Brown the motorways by the window
Pour active traficwhich was one of the spearheads of the no. Therefore, “it is unacceptable”. For example, “Given our climatic objectives. Furthermore, Detec should establish a moratorium on motorway projects and invest resolutely nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not in public transport, bicycle and walking.” The association also accuses Albert Rösti of acting on the Catimini. Furthermore, “This way of bringing out the window refused by the people is very problematic from a democratic point of view.”
On the side of Albert Rösti’s services, we defend ourselves. For example, On the bottom first. For example, explaining that this non -vote did not make the challenges in terms of traffic on the sections concerned. Furthermore, “The federal constitution requires that the Confederation and the cantons ensure sufficient road infrastructure in all regions of the country. In addition, A decision on the implementation of the measures. their priority order will be made after the EPFZ has rendered its results, “said Valérie Gerl, spokesperson.
At this point, you will find additional external content. If you accept that cookies are placed by external suppliers. nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not that personal data are transmitted to them, you must allow all cookies and directly display external content.
On the form then. recalling that Albert Rösti had already mentioned, on January 28, the draft of these six projects. “We want to include in the examination all the projects of the strategic development program of national roads which have not yet been made compulsory by the Parliament. including those of the 2023 development stage which were rejected by the people,” he announced. This, of course, in absolute respect for popular decision. But the problems remain. And the question will be: how are we going to manage them? »»
The fact remains that under the Federal dome. most of the elected officials encountered had not achieved this possible co-back motorway.
Priority to nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not rail. not highways
Delphine Klopfenstein Broggini (The Greens/Ge), she quickly realized it, since as president of Pro Vélo, she is in the reflection organ. “These six motorway projects were indeed announced as being able to be part of the study. I then expressed my opposition, like all the sustainable mobility associations present. I was told that it was a question of integrating them to have the widest possible vision. And that this would not prejudge the future. But things are very clear for me: they cannot be part of the solution. while the people have clearly given their opinion. We would oppose it with all our might. ”
Delphine Klopfenstein Broggini (Verts/GE)
Yvain Genevay / Tamedia
Member of the CTT. Brenda Tuosto (PS/VD) was also one of the faces of the no. “I am very attached to respect for democratic rights. I find it unacceptable that one can consider returning with projects that the people have just refused. On the Geneva-Lausanne axis, but also Lausanne-Berne, priority must be given to the development of rail to catch up. That there is then a reflection on multimodal mobility, I can hear it. But for the road network, this must concern the agglomeration traffic and the nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not cantonal roads. In no case for highway projects. »»
Analyze the situation as a whole in Switzerland
Albert Rösti Would it flout the popular will? “Not at all,” replies Nicolas Kolly (UDC/FR), who supports his minister. Additionally, “If we want to make a serious report on mobility. we must analyze the situation as a whole, taking into account all the current problems, whether at the road, rail or agglomerations. And then assess all possible solutions, even if some have failed in voting. ”
He goes further: “On November 24, the people said no to a package comprising six highway projects. But who tells you that he would say in the same way on a package combining highway. rail development projects? »»
Damien Cottier (PLR/NE)
Yvain Genevay / Tamedia
Also a member of the CTT. Damien Cottier (PLR/NE) does not see a scandal either. “It is not because the people voted not that the problems were solved in these regions. And if we want Professor Weidmann to be able to grasp all the challenges related to mobility – road. as a rail – we cannot ignore this nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not reality. »»
The president of the PLR group specifies: “This does not mean that at the end of the exercise. it will be necessary to propose exactly the same projects. It would be pure political marketing. But just read les analyses Voxmade after the vote, to understand that there were different forms of non on November 24. The room for maneuver exists to bring a new vision. ” And to conclude: “Putting the work on the profession is the very basis of political work. »»
The management of the Nyon-le aveeron project pointed out
Highway A1. Here, the bypass of Geneva.
Lucien fortunate
Of the six projects selected for the vote of November 24, the least advanced was that connecting Nyon to avengeron. A situation that prompted the Federal Finance Control To put your nose in this three -way enlargement provided for 20 kilometers.
Despite the rejection of the voting project, the CDF decided to publish its audit report. “Its results can be used for other current projects. to be carried out by the Federal Road Office (OFROU),” says the finance gendarme. Recommendations must be used for continuous nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not improvement in the management of road infrastructure projects inspired by good practices to. which this report refers. ”
It must be said that the audit points the finger at the conduct of the project. And it is above all costs that attracts attention. “The prognosis for the final cost is poorly managed, because different values appear simultaneously in different reportingspecifies the CDF. It also lacks an overview of the costs of changes and optimizations. ” Finally, the OFROU is criticized for a lack of transparency on the sum of the reserves.
If ofrou is “overall” agree with the recommendations of the CDF, he wishes to provide details. According to him. it is important to understand that the estimate, not the forecast of the final costs, is the central element of the cost control of a project. The rules nyon-le vengeron: extension a1 not thus allow “reliable and transparent costs.”
Did you find an error? Please report it to us.
Further reading: Estavayer-le-Lac: his car takes fire while he drives – Lancy unveils its first economic promotion strategy – Geneva: the Sofia app and its AI to take its medication well – More beaches, more parks: what will the Geneva “City” look like? – Rts.ch – Geneva Council of State: 10 candidates to succeed Antonio Hodgers.
