A report by the American government on the climate accused of distorting scientific studies

Primary scientists told Thursday. Similarly, July 31, at the Agency France-Presse (AFP) that their research, cited in a flagship report of the US Energy Ministry, had report american government climate accused been diverted to minimize the role of human activity in climate change.

This report. Nevertheless, published on July 29, exhibits the arguments which led the Trump administration to return, on Tuesday, on a key decision dating from 2009 for the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, still putting the fight against climate change in the United States a little more. In addition, He was written by a working group in which John Christy. Judith Curry participated, both partners in the past at the Heartland Institute, a pressure group which frequently opposes the scientific consensus on climate change.

The document “Deform my work completely”said to AFP Benjamin Santer. climatologist and honorary professor at the University of East Anglia, in the United Kingdom. He explained that a section of the report devoted to “Cooling the stratosphere” contradicted his conclusions. AFP. other media, including the American information site Knownhave found report american government climate accused inaccurate quotes, erroneous analyzes and editorial faults in the report.

It is the third time this year. that scientists have been declaring to AFP that an American government agency has distorted university work to defend its policies. The White House hadtened in May to modify a report on diseases affecting young Americans who initially based on. non -existent scientific studies.

“Analized interpretation of many studies” – Report american government climate accused

“I am concerned about the fact that a government agency has published a report intended to inform the public. to orient policies report american government climate accused without having been submitted to a rigorous process of peer evaluation, while interpreting in a erroneous way many studies which, they have been”reacted to AFP Bor-Ting Jong, assistant professor at the Vrije Universiteit d’Amsterdam. She pointed out that this document contained false claims concerning the climate model studied by her team. used a different terminology that led to a misinterpretation of her results.

A researcher in climatology at the University of St Andrews. in Scotland, James Rae, who also denounces a poor presentation of his work in the report report american government climate accused of the US Energy Ministry, told AFP that the change in the way in which this administration used science is “Truly freezing” ; elle “Has been for decades at the forefront of scientific research. Gold [son] report looks like a license student exercise to distort climate science ”he added.

Contacted by AFP. a ministry spokesman said that the document in question had been examined internally by a group of scientists and public policies experts. The public will now have the opportunity to formulate comments on its content before its final publication in the. federal register.