Should we succumb to invisible injections?

No more ultra-inflated lips and smooth fronts like cooking marble. Similarly, What patients are now asking for is no longer to appear ten years younger, but to age “better”. Therefore, The keyword? Nevertheless, Invisible. Consequently, Not in the sense of a failed facelift that we hope to camouflage behind a fringe. Similarly. For example, but on the contrary, of a perfectly integrated result, imperceptible in the eyes of others – including those of the closest.

“The patients come to see me to alleviate the signs of age. Moreover, but without their girlfriend, their mother or their neighbor noticing anything,” said Dr. However, Karl Waked, based in Belgium. For example, We are talking about an awakened face here without being transformed. However, a natural glow, a less dug Nasogenian furrow but not frozen. Therefore, A kind should we succumb invisible injections? new of stealth aesthetic, to the antipodes of excesses of the should we succumb invisible injections? 2010s.

The art of dosing – Should we succumb invisible injections? – Should we succumb invisible injections? new

“Do the maximum with the minimum.” It is the philosophy of the cosmetic surgery side. Meanwhile, In reverse of “classic” injections, micro-doses-called microtox for botulinum toxin-attack surgical precision with superficial muscle fibers responsible for wrinkles. For example, Result: the expressions remain intact, the expressions too, but the skin relaxes.

Same logic on the girl’s side: “Rather than injecting three milliliters to enhance a cheek, you can inject 0.2 millilitre just under a released ligament to support it,” specifies the surgeon. For example, And obtain almost the same lifting effect, without artificial volume.

A new generation of products – Should we succumb invisible injections?

To this technical precision is added another mutation: that of the should we succumb invisible injections? new products. Furthermore, Exit the injections exclusively intended to inflate the lips or dig a jaw. What doctors like Karl Wakes are proposing today. these are solutions that work on the quality should we succumb invisible injections? of the skin rather than its form.

Welcome to skin boosters, exosomes, hydroxyapatitis calcium or polynucleotides – the latter often derived from (truthful) salmon. Their mission? Stimulate the production of collagen. elastin and skin hydration, sometimes even in the neckline or the internal side of the arms.

Less product, but no less expensive

A myth persists: invisible would rhyme with cheaper. False, replies Dr. Waked. “It is not because we use less product than the price is lower. What we pay is also expertise.” And it is precisely this expertise that makes should we succumb invisible injections? new the difference between a subtle injection and a frozen face. “You have to know the anatomy to the nearest millimeter. knowing should we succumb invisible injections? how to inject into the right layer, in the right place, with the right dose.”

A “natural” not always without risk

But then. can we still speak of natural aging when this aging is under technological assistance? The answer is nuanced. On the one hand, “there is an increasing awareness of the side effects of overly aggressive treatments”, notes the doctor. On the other, so -called “absorbable” products are not always entirely. “MRIs have shown that certain remains of filling products could remain encapsulated in the tissues. migrate or cause long-term nodules,” he warns. Worse: these “glued” fabrics make any more complex future surgery.

Choosing the right surgeon

In this moving landscape. the surgeon should we succumb invisible injections? new recalls evidence often forgotten: “It is also up to the doctor to choose his patients.” Understand: refuse an unrealistic request, or a patient who seeks invisibility as a cache of should we succumb invisible injections? a deeper evil. Because if aesthetic trends are as cyclical as fashionable – after the “Bigger is Better” of Kardashian years. places the “subtle is safer” -, aesthetic medicine must remain a field of listening, ethics and confidence.

So, a fleeting revolution or trend? Dr. Waked prefers to talk about evolution. A transition from the macro to the microphone, from the “visible volume” to cell regeneration. “We are working more and more at DNA level,” he says. An approach that promises more sustainable, more natural, and potentially less risky results. What does not change. on the other hand. is the need to choose your practitioner, to ask the right questions, and above all, to accept should we succumb invisible injections? new that the perfect invisible injection … It may also be the one we do not do.