The Val de Bagnes illegal constructions scandal is the most shameful political-judicial case in contemporary history in Valais. However, no internal investigation has never been triggered within the cantonal administration by the former head of the institutions department and by the former head of the finance department. For anyone who knows what it is a question is similar to a resignation and the disappearance of the rule of law.
Yet objects that can trigger real questions relating to major dysfunctions of civil servants in the state or the municipality are legion:
a) Why did the SAIC, particularly its chef Maurice Chevrier, has abstained from any effective intervention even when all the elements were in his possession for a long time?
b) Why did this same chief of the Saic for years refuse to reject himself even though the cantonal court reprobating his attitude has qualified his behavior as a heavy false?
c) How is it that today the Council of State does not want to produce in favor of the main victim of official documents however required of the Cantonal Transparency Commission?
d) How is it that the cantonal government is afraid of reprisals if it produces these documents?
e) How is it that no action in restitution of illicit gains has been introduced, or that this point has been controlled?
f) How is it that a gross negligence committed by the chief of the Saic did not lead to any sanction?
g) How is it that the Council of State has chosen to dawdle at this point and dare to assert later that the affair of illicit constructions even he knew the intensity of the offenses committed?
h) Noting the very serious deficiencies of the former Attorney General, why did the Council of State remain speechless?
I) How is it that cantonal officials moved to Verbier, noted irregularities and have laid down gear without serious effect?
J) How is it that all the successive and repeated warnings of the main victim and his agent, of which she had died and that the political authorities refused to be confronted with their arguments?
K) How is it that to date no criminal offense has been noted by an enforceable judgment?
l) How is it that a municipal authority invented the existence of false criminal convictions pronounced against the victim in order to refuse him just compensation and that no serious suite was given to these new illicit acts?
In a state of law not favoring wealthy out-of-law, it has been a long time since the great advisor would have appointed an extraordinary commission of inquiry on the affair of illicit construction of prison that the Council of State and the prosecutor know since July 19, 2016 to be closely linked to the dismissal of the Châble bear.
As the journalist who revealed the journalist who revealed on August 21, 2015, the case of illicit constructions, such an attitude is unworthy, unfair and unbearable.
How can all these people look at themselves in the morning in their mirror without failing ashamed? This is the question that I asked lost to former cantonal judge Jean-Claude Lugon in 1992 as part of the BCV-Dorsaz affair truffled with lies and state manipulations.
Nothing has changed, quite the contrary.
