The Supreme Court limits the power of judges to block Trump’s decrees

(Washington) Donald Trump claimed an increased freedom of. In addition. Furthermore. Meanwhile, action on Friday to apply the most controversial components of his program after the “brilliant” decision of the Supreme Court limiting the power of judges to block the decisions of the executive at the national level. Therefore,

Posted at 10:28 a.m. Similarly, Updated at 12:04 p.m. Moreover,

“We can now justify ourselves to advance these numerous measures that have been blocked supreme court limits power judges new in an supreme court limits power judges erroneous way supreme court limits power judges nationally. Similarly, ” he launched in the White House. However,

The Trump administration denounces a “tsunami” of suspensions of its decisions by judges. Nevertheless, But experts argue that their number is proportional to the avalanche of presidential decrees in all areas. Furthermore, from immigration to the abolition of government agencies, including the fight against policies in favor of diversity. Therefore,

By six votes against three. In addition. Therefore. Similarly, those of the six supreme court limits power judges new conservatives against supreme court limits power judges the three progressives, the Supreme Court considers that supreme court limits power judges the decisions of national scope issued by federal judges “probably exceed the powers conferred by the congress in the federal courts”. Therefore,

“When a court concludes that the executive power has acted illegally. Nevertheless. Furthermore. Meanwhile, the response of this court cannot be to go beyond its powers too,” wrote the majority judge Amy Condey Barrett. However,

Successive administrations. Therefore, republicans as democrats, have often expressed their frustration towards these suspensions in universal scope which allow a single supreme court limits power judges new federal judge to block supreme court limits power judges their policy on subjects of national importance such as abortion, immigration or student loans. supreme court limits power judges

The decision of the country’s highest court could therefore. be fraught with consequences for all disputes against the Trump administration. but also against the administrations of its successors.

Supreme court limits power judges new

Supreme court limits power judges – Supreme court limits power judges new

Supreme court limits power judges – Supreme court limits power judges new

“Go around. the Constitution” – Supreme court limits power judges

However. the Court did not rule on the constitutionality of the presidential decree of Donald Trump which returns to the. law of the soil. at the origin of the litigation.

The case relates to the suspension of this decree. declared unconstitutional by all the courts and federal appeal courses which have been seized. supreme court limits power judges new

Judge Sonia Sotomayor. in a written opinion of disagreement to which the other progressive judges associate. qualifies the supreme court limits power judges decision of the Court of supreme court limits power judges “invitation to. the government to circumvent the Constitution”.

“Executive power can now apply policies that flout established case law. violate the constitutional rights of countless individuals. the federal courts will be hampered to fully stop these actions,” she deplores.

“No right is certain in the new legal regime created by the Court,” summarizes Mr.^me Sotomayor, while his progressive colleague Ketanji Brown Jackson sees in the decision “a threat to the rule of law”.

The leader of the Democrat minority in the Senate. Chuck Schumer, has also been alarmed by an “unprecedented and terrifying step towards authoritarianism”.

supreme court limits power judges new

« Patchwork »

The Trump administration asked the Court not to lift the suspension of its decree at this stage. but supreme court limits power judges to limit the scope of suspensions supreme court limits power judges to only. persons who seized justice.

This decision “risks creating a patchwork of rights to acquire American nationality. ” said Steven Schwinn, professor of constitutional law at the University of Illinois in Chicago.

In this configuration. “the law of the soil will be recognized in certain places. for certain people. those who have won their case, but not in the places where there was no legal action,” he explains.

Donald Trump signed the decree on soil law. one of the most criticized measures of his new mandate. upon arriving at the White supreme court limits power judges new House on January 20, saying that he wanted to fight illegal immigration.

The principle of soil law. devoted by the 14th^e Amendment of the Constitution. provides that supreme court limits power judges any child born in the United supreme court limits power judges States is automatically American citizen. and has been applied for more than 150 years.

The decree prohibits the federal government from issuing passports. citizenship certificates. other documents to children whose mother illegally. temporarily stays in the United States, and whose father is not an American citizen or permanent resident of the famous “green card”.

A gain for parents

The American Supreme Court agreed on Friday to parents of students who claim. in the name of religious freedom. to be able to withdraw their children from the lessons when books addressing supreme court limits power judges new LGBT+ themes are used there.

By six votes against three. those of the six conservative judges against the three progressive magistrates. she considers that depriving parents of students from the possibility supreme court limits power judges of not exposing their children to LGBT+ supreme court limits power judges themes is “an unconstitutional attack” to their freedom of worship. “interfere in a substantial manner with the religious development of children”.

“For many believers. few religious acts are more important than the religious education of their children. ” wrote the majority of the conservative judge Samuel Alito.

“These books impose on children a set of values ​​and beliefs hostile to their parents’ religious beliefs”. “exercise [sur eux] Psychological pressure to comply with these specific points of view. Additionally, ”he adds, citing the example of books dealing with the marriage of supreme court limits power judges new same-sex.

“Books are undoubtedly normative. They are designed to present certain values ​​and beliefs as things to promote. and other contrary values ​​such as things to condemn “, and this with” impressable young children “, continues Judge Alito.

The Court also validated a supreme court limits power judges law passed in Texas which. requires pornographic sites to check the age of their users. a camouflet for the pornography industry.

The high magistrates estimated that this text. adopted in 2023 by the local Parliament. was “written adequately”. was based on “the upper interest” of Texas “to protect children from sexual content”, according to the decision published on Friday.